Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorRosel, Jesús F.
dc.contributor.authorPuchol, Sara
dc.contributor.authorFlor Arasil, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorMachancoses, Francisco H.
dc.contributor.authorCanales, Juan J.
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-16T09:47:11Z
dc.date.available2023-10-16T09:47:11Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10234/204504
dc.descriptionDatos de investigación y preprintca_CA
dc.description.abstractWhile the theory of longitudinal data analysis (LDA) has a solid foundation, there are instances where the assumptions of the analytical model remain unverified. Failure to examine autocorrelation in residuals (ACR) can elevate the risk of committing a Type I error, leading to the rejection of a true null hypothesis. This study compares two distinct analytical models within LDA: the polynomial (straight line, quadratic…) model and the autoregressive (AR) model. Three separate studies were conducted to investigate this comparison.ca_CA
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/zipca_CA
dc.language.isoengca_CA
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ca_CA
dc.subjectlongitudinal dataca_CA
dc.subjectintensive longitudinal designsca_CA
dc.subjectpooled time seriesca_CA
dc.subjectpanel dataca_CA
dc.subjectautocorrelation in residualsca_CA
dc.titleAnother perspective on autocorrelation in intensive longitudinal data: Polynomial (straight line, quadratic…) ‘vs’ autoregressive modelsca_CA
dc.typeDatasetca_CA
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessca_CA
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersionca_CA


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/