Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
Another perspective on autocorrelation in intensive longitudinal data: Polynomial (straight line, quadratic…) ‘vs’ autoregressive models
dc.contributor.author | Rosel, Jesús F. | |
dc.contributor.author | Puchol, Sara | |
dc.contributor.author | Flor Arasil, Patricia | |
dc.contributor.author | Machancoses, Francisco H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Canales, Juan J. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-16T09:47:11Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-10-16T09:47:11Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10234/204504 | |
dc.description | Datos de investigación y preprint | ca_CA |
dc.description.abstract | While the theory of longitudinal data analysis (LDA) has a solid foundation, there are instances where the assumptions of the analytical model remain unverified. Failure to examine autocorrelation in residuals (ACR) can elevate the risk of committing a Type I error, leading to the rejection of a true null hypothesis. This study compares two distinct analytical models within LDA: the polynomial (straight line, quadratic…) model and the autoregressive (AR) model. Three separate studies were conducted to investigate this comparison. | ca_CA |
dc.format.mimetype | application/zip | ca_CA |
dc.language.iso | eng | ca_CA |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ | ca_CA |
dc.subject | longitudinal data | ca_CA |
dc.subject | intensive longitudinal designs | ca_CA |
dc.subject | pooled time series | ca_CA |
dc.subject | panel data | ca_CA |
dc.subject | autocorrelation in residuals | ca_CA |
dc.title | Another perspective on autocorrelation in intensive longitudinal data: Polynomial (straight line, quadratic…) ‘vs’ autoregressive models | ca_CA |
dc.type | Dataset | ca_CA |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | ca_CA |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersion | ca_CA |
Ficheros en el ítem
Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)
-
PSI_Dades d'investigació [13]
Dades d'investigació