The week after running a marathon: effects of running vs elliptical Training vs resting on neuromuscular performance and muscle damage recovery
Ver/ Abrir
Impacto
Scholar |
Otros documentos de la autoría: MARTINEZ-NAVARRO, IGNACIO; Montoya-Vieco, Antonio; Hernando, Carlos; Hernando, Barbara; Panizo, Nayara; Collado-Boira, Eladio
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemcomunitat-uji-handle:10234/9
comunitat-uji-handle2:10234/174799
comunitat-uji-handle3:10234/174800
comunitat-uji-handle4:
INVESTIGACIONMetadatos
Título
The week after running a marathon: effects of running vs elliptical Training vs resting on neuromuscular performance and muscle damage recoveryAutoría
Fecha de publicación
2021-01-18Editor
Taylor & Francis & European College of Sport ScienceISSN
1746-1391Cita bibliográfica
MARTINEZ-NAVARRO, Ignacio, et al. The Week After Running a Marathon: Effects of Running vs Elliptical Training vs Resting on Neuromuscular Performance and Muscle Damage Recovery. 2020.Tipo de documento
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleVersión de la editorial
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17461391.2020.1857441Versión
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionPalabras clave / Materias
Resumen
Our aim was to compare the effects of two exercise modalities vs resting on the time course of neuromuscular performance and muscle damage recovery during the week after running a marathon. Sixty-four finishers from ... [+]
Our aim was to compare the effects of two exercise modalities vs resting on the time course of neuromuscular performance and muscle damage recovery during the week after running a marathon. Sixty-four finishers from a road marathon completed the study (54 men and 10 women; 39 ± 4 years; 3 h 35 min ± 21 min). The day before the race, within 15 min after finishing the marathon and at 24, 48, 96, 144 and 192 h postrace, lactate dehydrogenase and creatine kinase were analysed. Participants also performed a squat jump (SJ) test before and after the marathon and at 48, 96 and 144 h postrace. On their arrival to the finish line, participants were randomized into one of the three intervention groups: running (RUN), elliptical training (ELIP) and resting recovery (REST). RUN and ELIP groups exercised continuously for 40 min at a moderate intensity (95–105% of the HR corresponding to the first ventilatory threshold) at 48, 96 and 144 h after the marathon. Neither ‘Intervention’ factor nor ‘Intervention x Time’ interaction effects were revealed for muscle damage blood markers (p > 0.05). On the other hand, RUN group evidenced an enhancement in SJ performance 96 h post-marathon as compared with REST group (108.29 ± 10.64 vs 100.58 ± 9.16%, p = 0.020, d = 0.80). Consequently, return to running at 48 h post-marathon does not seem to have a negative impact on muscle damage recovery up to eight days post-race and it could be recommended in order to speed up neuromuscular recovery. [-]
Publicado en
European Journal of Sport ScienceEntidad financiadora
FUNDACIÓN HOSPITALES VITHAS | FUNDACIÓN TRINIDAD ALFONSO
Derechos de acceso
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Aparece en las colecciones
- EDE_Articles [410]