Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
The week after running a marathon: effects of running vs elliptical Training vs resting on neuromuscular performance and muscle damage recovery
dc.contributor.author | MARTINEZ-NAVARRO, IGNACIO | |
dc.contributor.author | Montoya-Vieco, Antonio | |
dc.contributor.author | Hernando, Carlos | |
dc.contributor.author | Hernando, Barbara | |
dc.contributor.author | Panizo, Nayara | |
dc.contributor.author | Collado-Boira, Eladio | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-02-17T14:21:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-02-17T14:21:50Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-01-18 | |
dc.identifier.citation | MARTINEZ-NAVARRO, Ignacio, et al. The Week After Running a Marathon: Effects of Running vs Elliptical Training vs Resting on Neuromuscular Performance and Muscle Damage Recovery. 2020. | ca_CA |
dc.identifier.issn | 1746-1391 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10234/192075 | |
dc.description.abstract | Our aim was to compare the effects of two exercise modalities vs resting on the time course of neuromuscular performance and muscle damage recovery during the week after running a marathon. Sixty-four finishers from a road marathon completed the study (54 men and 10 women; 39 ± 4 years; 3 h 35 min ± 21 min). The day before the race, within 15 min after finishing the marathon and at 24, 48, 96, 144 and 192 h postrace, lactate dehydrogenase and creatine kinase were analysed. Participants also performed a squat jump (SJ) test before and after the marathon and at 48, 96 and 144 h postrace. On their arrival to the finish line, participants were randomized into one of the three intervention groups: running (RUN), elliptical training (ELIP) and resting recovery (REST). RUN and ELIP groups exercised continuously for 40 min at a moderate intensity (95–105% of the HR corresponding to the first ventilatory threshold) at 48, 96 and 144 h after the marathon. Neither ‘Intervention’ factor nor ‘Intervention x Time’ interaction effects were revealed for muscle damage blood markers (p > 0.05). On the other hand, RUN group evidenced an enhancement in SJ performance 96 h post-marathon as compared with REST group (108.29 ± 10.64 vs 100.58 ± 9.16%, p = 0.020, d = 0.80). Consequently, return to running at 48 h post-marathon does not seem to have a negative impact on muscle damage recovery up to eight days post-race and it could be recommended in order to speed up neuromuscular recovery. | ca_CA |
dc.format.extent | 17 p. | ca_CA |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | ca_CA |
dc.language.iso | eng | ca_CA |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis & European College of Sport Science | ca_CA |
dc.relation.isPartOf | European Journal of Sport Science | ca_CA |
dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/ | * |
dc.subject | fatigue | ca_CA |
dc.subject | musculoskeletal | ca_CA |
dc.subject | performance | ca_CA |
dc.title | The week after running a marathon: effects of running vs elliptical Training vs resting on neuromuscular performance and muscle damage recovery | ca_CA |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | ca_CA |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2020.1857441 | |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | ca_CA |
dc.relation.publisherVersion | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17461391.2020.1857441 | ca_CA |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion | ca_CA |
project.funder.name | FUNDACIÓN HOSPITALES VITHAS | ca_CA |
project.funder.name | FUNDACIÓN TRINIDAD ALFONSO | ca_CA |
Ficheros en el ítem
Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)
-
EDE_Articles [411]