Professional Self-Efficacy as a Predictor of Burnout and Engagement: The Role of Challenge and Hindrance Demands
Impacto
Scholar |
Otros documentos de la autoría: Ventura, Mercedes; Salanova, Marisa; Llorens Gumbau, Susana
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemcomunitat-uji-handle:10234/9
comunitat-uji-handle2:10234/8034
comunitat-uji-handle3:10234/8637
comunitat-uji-handle4:
INVESTIGACIONEste recurso está restringido
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2013.876380 |
Metadatos
Título
Professional Self-Efficacy as a Predictor of Burnout and Engagement: The Role of Challenge and Hindrance DemandsFecha de publicación
2015Editor
Taylor & FrancisISSN
0022-3980Tipo de documento
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleVersión de la editorial
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00223980.2013.876380Versión
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPalabras clave / Materias
Resumen
The objective of the current study is to analyze the role of professional self-efficacy as a predictor of psychosocial well-being (i.e., burnout and engagement) following the Social Cognitive Theory of Albert Bandura ... [+]
The objective of the current study is to analyze the role of professional self-efficacy as a predictor of psychosocial well-being (i.e., burnout and engagement) following the Social Cognitive Theory of Albert Bandura (1997). Structural Equation Modeling was performed in a sample of secondary school teachers (n = 460) and users of Information and Communication Technology (n = 596). Results show empirical support for the predicting role that professional self-efficacy plays in the perception of challenge (i.e., mental overload) and hindrance demands (i.e., role conflict, lack of control, and lack of social support), which are in turn related to burnout (i.e., erosion process) and engagement (i.e., motivational process). Specifically, employees with more professional self-efficacy will perceive more challenge demands and fewer hindrance demands, and this will in turn relate to more engagement and less burnout. A multi-group analysis showed that the research model was invariant across both samples. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed. [-]
Publicado en
The Journal of Psychology, 2015, v. 149 (3)Derechos de acceso
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
Aparece en las colecciones
- PSI_Articles [600]