Emotional Reactivity during anticipation and perception of affective pictures
View/ Open
Impact
Scholar |
Other documents of the author: Pastor, M. Carmen; Poy, Rosario; Segarra, Pilar; Molto, Javier
Metadata
Show full item recordcomunitat-uji-handle:10234/9
comunitat-uji-handle2:10234/8033
comunitat-uji-handle3:10234/8636
comunitat-uji-handle4:
INVESTIGACIONMetadata
Title
Emotional Reactivity during anticipation and perception of affective picturesDate
2014Publisher
Cambridge University PressBibliographic citation
PASTOR, M. Carmen, et al. Emotional Reactivity during Anticipation and Perception of Affective Pictures. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 2014, 17: E110.Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/articlePublisher version
http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=9512088 ...Version
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionSubject
Abstract
The focus of the present study was on further exploring anticipatory responses to emotional stimuli by measuring the eyeblink startle reflex in a variation of the picture-picture affective learning procedure. Partic ... [+]
The focus of the present study was on further exploring anticipatory responses to emotional stimuli by measuring the eyeblink startle reflex in a variation of the picture-picture affective learning procedure. Participants (113 undergraduate women) were not explicitly instructed before the experiment began. Instead, they had to learn the specific relations between cues (geometrical shapes) and emotional pictures based on pairings during the first part of the task. Plausible contingency learning effects were tested afterwards, in a parallel sequence of trials including auditory probes during cues and pictures processing during the second part of the task. Results did show the typical affective startle modulation pattern during perception, linear F(1, 200) = 52.67, p < .0001, but unexpected inhibition for both pleasant and unpleasant, compared to neutral cues, during anticipation, quadratic F(1, 200) = 7.07, p < .009. All patterns of startle modulation were independent of cue-picture contingency awareness (all interactions Fs < 1). Skin conductance changes showed the predictable quadratic trend either during picture perception or anticipatory periods (greater activity for emotional vs. neutral; overall quadratic F(1, 224) = 7.04, p < .01), only for participants fully aware of the cue-picture contingency, quadratic F(1, 158) = 5.86, p < .02. Overall, our results during anticipation (cues processing) seem to suggest that more resources were allocated to highly arousing pictures that engage attention. Differences between the present results and prior research may be attributed to procedural variations in the sample, cues, or instructions. Future studies should also explore in more detail the role of the contingency awareness during anticipation. [-]
Is part of
The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 2014, 17Rights
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2014
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
This item appears in the folowing collection(s)
- PSB_Articles [1330]