Analyzing the suitability of LCIA methods to foster the most beneficial food loss and waste prevention action in terms of environmental sustainability
Ver/ Abrir
Impacto
Scholar |
Otros documentos de la autoría: Domingo-Morcillo, Elena; Escrig-Olmedo, Elena; Rivera-Lirio, Juana M.; Muñoz-Torres, María Jesus
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemcomunitat-uji-handle:10234/9
comunitat-uji-handle2:10234/8648
comunitat-uji-handle3:10234/8649
comunitat-uji-handle4:
INVESTIGACIONMetadatos
Título
Analyzing the suitability of LCIA methods to foster the most beneficial food loss and waste prevention action in terms of environmental sustainabilityAutoría
Fecha de publicación
2024-06Editor
ElsevierCita bibliográfica
Domingo-Morcillo, E., Escrig-Olmedo, E., Rivera-Lirio, J. M., & Muñoz-Torres, M. J. (2024). Analyzing the suitability of LCIA methods to foster the most beneficial food loss and waste prevention action in terms of environmental sustainability. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 107, 107575.Tipo de documento
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleVersión de la editorial
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524001628?via%3DihubVersión
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPalabras clave / Materias
Resumen
The food value chain is responsible for significant environmental and resource pressures. 14% of the total food
produced in the EU is lost or wasted along the supply chain (FAO, 2019) and 19% is disposed of when ... [+]
The food value chain is responsible for significant environmental and resource pressures. 14% of the total food
produced in the EU is lost or wasted along the supply chain (FAO, 2019) and 19% is disposed of when reaching
the consumption stage (UNEP, 2024). Therefore, to tackle the problem of food loss and waste (FLW), it is crucial
to make the agri-food system sustainable. Adopting a life cycle approach to measure and assess the impacts
created by FLW prevention actions is key to achieving this transition. This paper provides a detailed mapping
study of EU projects that previously dealt with the issue of FLW prevention and compiles the LCIA methods that
were used to conduct their environmental assessments. Two essential requirements are set to evaluate the
suitability of the identified LCIA methods to detect the most beneficial FLW prevention and reduction (FLWPR)
action in terms of environmental sustainability. Results show that the Environmental Footprint v3.0 method (EF
v3.0) is the LCIA method that better meets these requirements. To shed light on its suitability, this paper uses the
EF v3.0 method to make a comparative LCA of two specific hypothetical FLWPR actions concerning the fresh
tomato value chain. Moreover, this study highlights the strengths of this LCIA method and explores pathways to
overcome possible shortcomings. The outputs of this study represent an academic breakthrough in the field of
FLWPR by addressing the requirements for guiding the selection of a method that enhances comparability be-
tween FLWPR actions and provides science-based tools that can help decision-makers follow a path to a more
sustainable agri-food system. [-]
Publicado en
Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2024, 107Entidad financiadora
Horizon Europe
Código del proyecto o subvención
101059849
Título del proyecto o subvención
TONOWASTE-Towards a new zero food waste mindset based on holistic assessment
Proyecto de investigación
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/HorizonEurope/101059849Derechos de acceso
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess