Stakeholders? views on online interventions to prevent common mental health disorders in adults implemented into existing healthcare systems in Europe
Ver/ Abrir
Impacto
Scholar |
Otros documentos de la autoría: Kuso, Stefanie; Nitsch, Martina; Zeiler, Michael; Simek, Monika; Adamcik, Tanja; Dey, Michelle; Berger, Thomas; Krieger, Tobias; Weisel, Kiona K.; Zarski, Anna-Carlotta; Ebert, David Daniel; Schaub, Michael P.; Moser, Christian Thomas; Botella, Cristina; Baños, Rosa Maria; Herrero, Rocío; Etchemendy, Ernestina; Nacke, Barbara; Beintner, Ina; Vollert, Bianka; Schmidt-Hantke, Juliane; Hütter, Kristian; Jacobi, Corinna; Waldherr, Karin
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemcomunitat-uji-handle:10234/9
comunitat-uji-handle2:10234/8033
comunitat-uji-handle3:10234/8636
comunitat-uji-handle4:
INVESTIGACIONMetadatos
Título
Stakeholders? views on online interventions to prevent common mental health disorders in adults implemented into existing healthcare systems in EuropeAutoría
Fecha de publicación
2021-07-07Editor
Oxford University PressCita bibliográfica
KUSO, Stefanie, et al. Stakeholders’ views on online interventions to prevent common mental health disorders in adults implemented into existing healthcare systems in Europe. European journal of public health, 2021, vol. 31, no Supplement_1, p. i55-i63.Tipo de documento
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleVersión
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPalabras clave / Materias
Resumen
Background: Online preventive interventions can help to reduce the incidence of mental disorders. Whereas
knowledge on stakeholders’ attitudes and factors relevant for successfully integrating online treatment ... [+]
Background: Online preventive interventions can help to reduce the incidence of mental disorders. Whereas
knowledge on stakeholders’ attitudes and factors relevant for successfully integrating online treatment into
existing healthcare systems is available, knowledge is scarce for online prevention. Methods: Stakeholders from
Germany, Switzerland, Austria and Spain were surveyed. Potential facilitators/delivery staff (e.g. psychologists,
psychotherapists) completed an online questionnaire (n ¼ 183), policy makers (i.e. from the governing sector or
health insurance providers) participated in semi-structured interviews (n ¼ 16) and target groups/potential users
of mental illness prevention (n ¼ 49) participated in ten focus groups. Thematic analysis was used to identify their
experiences with and attitudes and needs regarding online programmes to prevent mental disorders.
Additionally, it was examined which groups they consider underserved and which factors they consider as fostering and hindering for reach, adoption, implementation and maintenance (cf. RE-AIM model) when integrating
online prevention into existing healthcare systems. Results: Main advantages of online mental illness prevention
are perceived in low structural and psychological barriers. Lack of personal contact, security, privacy and trust
concerns were discussed as disadvantages. Relevant needs are high usability and target group appropriateness,
evidence for effectiveness and the use of motivational tools. Conclusions: Positive attitudes among stakeholders
are the key for successful integration of online mental illness prevention into existing healthcare systems.
Potential facilitators/delivery staff must receive training and support to implement these programmes; the programmes must be attractive and continuously evaluated, updated and promoted to ensure ongoing reach; and
existing infrastructure and contextual factors must be considered. [-]
Publicado en
European Journal of Public Health, Volume 31, Issue Suppl. 1, July 2021Entidad financiadora
European Union Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme
Código del proyecto o subvención
634757
Derechos de acceso
The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Aparece en las colecciones
- PSB_Articles [1302]