Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
Can environmental, social, and governance rating agencies favor business models that promote a more sustainable development?
dc.contributor.author | Muñoz-Torres, María Jesus | |
dc.contributor.author | Fernandez-Izquierdo, Maria Angeles | |
dc.contributor.author | Rivera-Lirio, Juana M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Escrig-Olmedo, Elena | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-05-14T10:42:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-05-14T10:42:54Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.citation | MUÑOZ‐TORRES, María Jesús, et al. Can environmental, social, and governance rating agencies favor business models that promote a more sustainable development?. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2019, vol. 26, no 2, p. 439-452 | ca_CA |
dc.identifier.issn | 1535-3958 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1535-3966 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10234/182486 | |
dc.description.abstract | The development of sustainable finance favors the appearance of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) rating agencies as providers of ESG information and tools for measuring the contribution of companies to sustainable development. This paper attempts to show whether assessment methods adopted by eight ESG agencies are consistent with the Integrative ESG Sustainable Value Framework proposed according to the literature and sustainable business models (SBMs) conceptualization. An exploratory research analyzes whether these methods are identifying and/or driving more SBMs that contribute to promote the creation of sustainable value, seeking to generate economic, social, and environmental value. Results indicate that ESG rating agencies identify the short‐term results in the internal organizational perspective mainly in the environmental dimension, whereas social aspects are emphasized from the external organizational perspective. However, ESG rating agencies are not driving a more SBMs that must integrate ESG criteria in a holistic way with a short‐term and long‐term perspective. | ca_CA |
dc.format.extent | 14 p. | ca_CA |
dc.language.iso | eng | ca_CA |
dc.publisher | Wiley | ca_CA |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2019, vol. 26, no 2 | ca_CA |
dc.rights | Copyright © John Wiley & Sons | ca_CA |
dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | * |
dc.subject | corporate sustainability (CS) | ca_CA |
dc.subject | environmental | ca_CA |
dc.subject | social and governance (ESG) rating agencies | ca_CA |
dc.subject | sustainable and responsible investment (SRI) | ca_CA |
dc.subject | sustainable business models (SBMs) | ca_CA |
dc.subject | sustainable development | ca_CA |
dc.subject | sustainable value creation | ca_CA |
dc.title | Can environmental, social, and governance rating agencies favor business models that promote a more sustainable development? | ca_CA |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | ca_CA |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1695 | |
dc.relation.projectID | European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme: 693642 | ca_CA |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | ca_CA |
dc.relation.publisherVersion | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/csr.1695 | ca_CA |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | ca_CA |
Ficheros en el ítem
Ficheros | Tamaño | Formato | Ver |
---|---|---|---|
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem. |
Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)
-
COFIN_Articles [218]