Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorPeña Monferrer, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorMonrós Andreu, Guillem
dc.contributor.authorchiva, sergio
dc.contributor.authorMartinez Cuenca, Raul
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz-Cobo, Jose-Luis
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-11T07:38:01Z
dc.date.available2018-10-11T07:38:01Z
dc.date.issued2018-02-23
dc.identifier.citationPEÑA-MONFERRER, C., et al. A CFD-DEM solver to model bubbly flow. Part II: Critical validation in upward vertical pipes including axial evolution. Chemical Engineering Science, 2018, vol. 177, p. 537-556.ca_CA
dc.identifier.issn0009-2509
dc.identifier.issn1873-4405
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10234/176672
dc.description.abstractIn the computational modeling of two-phase flow, many uncertainties are usually faced in simulations and validations with experiments. This has traditionally made it difficult to provide a general method to predict the two-phase flow characteristics for any geometry and condition, even for bubbly flow regimes. Thus, we focus our research on studying in depth the bubbly flow modeling and validation from a critical point of view. The conditions are intentionally limited to scenarios where coalescence and breakup can be neglected, to concentrate on the study of bubble dynamics and its interaction with the main fluid. This study required the development of a solver for bubbly flow with higher resolution level than TFM and a new methodology to obtain the data from the simulation. In Part II, taking profit of the detailed data provided by the CFD-DEM solver presented in Part I, we propose a novel methodology based on virtual sensor probes, to perform a rigorous validation and to investigate the experimental data. The same approximation used for processing the experimental datasets applies to simulation data, then the same assumptions are considered. In this way we can study an extended number of disperse phase variables as bubble velocity, void fraction, interfacial area concentration, mean chord length and distribution, Sauter mean diameter, bubble frequency and missing ratio, in addition to other variables as bubble size distribution or carrier phase velocity and turbulence. Several upward bubbly flow scenarios from datasets of different authors are used to validate the solver using this methodology. Finally, an axial evolution validation is performed including a discussion motivated by the comparison between experiments and the data from the virtual probes.ca_CA
dc.format.extent20 p.ca_CA
dc.language.isoengca_CA
dc.publisherElsevierca_CA
dc.relation.isPartOfChemical Engineering Science, 2018, vol. 177ca_CA
dc.rightsCopyright © Elsevier B.V.ca_CA
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/*
dc.subjectCFD-DEMca_CA
dc.subjectOpen FOAM®ca_CA
dc.subjecttwo-phase flowca_CA
dc.subjectbubbly flowca_CA
dc.subjectvirtual needle probesca_CA
dc.subjectcritical validationca_CA
dc.titleA CFD-DEM solver to model bubbly flow. Part II: Critical validation in upward vertical pipes including axial evolutionca_CA
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca_CA
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2017.11.032
dc.relation.projectIDPlan Nacional de I + D+i: MODEXFLAT ENE2013-48565-C2-1-P; ENE2013-48565-C2-2-Pca_CA
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessca_CA
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000925091730711X#!ca_CA
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca_CA


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem