Seguridad quirurgica y cumplimentación del registro de información intraquirúrgica en España: un análisis comparativo de dos instrumentos de registro.
Ver/ Abrir
Impacto
Scholar |
Otros documentos de la autoría: Torres Manrique, Blanca; Nolasco Bonmatí, Andreu; Macia Soler, Maria Loreto; Cervera-Gasch, Agueda; Seva Llor, Ana Myriam; Barbera Ortega, Maria del Carmen
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemcomunitat-uji-handle:10234/9
comunitat-uji-handle2:10234/36084
comunitat-uji-handle3:10234/36085
comunitat-uji-handle4:
INVESTIGACIONMetadatos
Título
Seguridad quirurgica y cumplimentación del registro de información intraquirúrgica en España: un análisis comparativo de dos instrumentos de registro.Autoría
Fecha de publicación
2016-01Editor
Copyright © 2016 Servicio de publicaciones. Universidad de Murcia.ISSN
1695-6141Cita bibliográfica
TORRES, B., et al. Seguridad quirúrgica y cumplimentación del registro de información intraquirúrgica en España: Un análisis comparativo de dos instrumentos de registro. Enfermería Global, 2016, 41: 183.Tipo de documento
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleVersión de la editorial
http://revistas.um.es/eglobal/article/view/206611Versión
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPalabras clave / Materias
Resumen
The objective of this study is to describe and compare the percentages of non-filling-in two recording instruments: Current sheet and surgical checklist in the same surgical setting for a sample of patients with similar ... [+]
The objective of this study is to describe and compare the percentages of non-filling-in two recording instruments: Current sheet and surgical checklist in the same surgical setting for a sample of patients with similar characteristics.
Methods: Descriptive study carried out with the intraoperative records of 3024 patients from Orthopedic Surgery and 1732 patients who were operated in 2009 with current sheet model completed at the end of the surgery and 1292 patients in 2010 with surgical checklist as recording model, completed during the intervention in three stages. Descriptive characteristics (mean, standard deviation, minimum and maximum) were calculated from the overall percentage of non-completion in both records, as well as the non-filling-in percentage (and confidence interval at 95%) of each item of the records studied.
Results: A higher overall – and also individual, in general- percentage of filling-in is observed in the current sheet than in the surgical checklist.
Conclusions: In general terms, the intraoperative recording with the highest percentage of being filled- in has been the circulating sheet and it has been observed the necessity to implement strategies to improve the level of filling-in due to its relationship with surgical clinical safety. [-]
Publicado en
Enfermería Global, Vol. 15, Núm. 1 (2016)Derechos de acceso
Copyright © 2016 Servicio de publicaciones. Universidad de Murcia.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Aparece en las colecciones
- INF_Articles [274]