Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorCherta Cucala, Laura
dc.contributor.authorBeltran Arandes, Joaquin
dc.contributor.authorPitarch, Elena
dc.contributor.authorHernandez, Felix
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-14T15:09:25Z
dc.date.available2014-03-14T15:09:25Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationFood Analytical Methods December 2013, Volume 6, Issue 6, pp 1671-1684ca_CA
dc.identifier.issn1936-9751
dc.identifier.issn1936-976X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10234/87429
dc.description.abstractThree sample treatment methods, based on QuEChERS, solid-phase extraction (SPE) and solid-phase microextraction (SPME), were compared and evaluated in order to obtain the best conditions to determine pesticide residues in fruit juice by fast gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (single quadrupole GC-MS). Analysis were performed under selected ion monitoring, acquiring the three most abundant and/or specific ions for each analyte and using their relative intensity ratios as a confirmatory parameter. The 3 methodologies (QuEChERS, SPE and SPME) were validated taking 15 selected pesticides as model compounds, using commercial apple juice. QuEChERS procedure was based on the AOAC Official Method 2007.01, using acetonitrile (containing 1 % acetic acid) as extraction solvent and primary–secondary amine during the dispersive solid-phase extraction. Oasis hydrophilic–lipophilic balance cartridges were used for SPE, and polyacrylate fibers were used for direct immersion SPME procedure. Three isotopically labeled standards were added to the samples before extraction and used as surrogate standards. Validation parameters as recoveries, limits of detection, and limits of quantification (LOQ), as well as matrix effects and sample throughput, were obtained and compared for the three extraction procedures. QuEChERS was considered faster and led to the best quantitative results. In this way, validation was extended to up to 56 pesticides by applying QuEChERS in multi-fruit juice samples, obtaining LOQs ranging from 2 to 20 μg/L for most compounds. Accuracy and precision were evaluated by means of recovery experiments at two concentration levels (10 and 100 μg/L), obtaining recoveries between 70 and 120 % in most cases and relative standard deviations below 15 %. Finally, the QuEChERS method was applied to the analysis of commercial juices, including mango–apple, pineapple, grapefruit and orange.ca_CA
dc.format.extent30 p.ca_CA
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfca_CA
dc.language.isoengca_CA
dc.publisherSpringer Verlagca_CA
dc.relation.isPartOfFood Analytical Methods December, 2013, vol. 6, no 6ca_CA
dc.rights© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013. The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12161-013-9578-8ca_CA
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/*
dc.subjectQuEChERSca_CA
dc.subjectSPEca_CA
dc.subjectSPMEca_CA
dc.subjectPesticidesca_CA
dc.subjectFast gas chromatography–mass spectrometryca_CA
dc.subjectJuicesca_CA
dc.titleComparison of Simple and Rapid Extraction Procedures for the Determination of Pesticide Residues in Fruit Juices by Fast Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometryca_CA
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca_CA
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12161-013-9578-8
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessca_CA
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12161-013-9578-8ca_CA
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersion


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem