Validation of an analytical methodology to quantify melamine in body fluids using micellar liquid chromatography
Impact
![Google Scholar](/xmlui/themes/Mirage2/images/uji/logo_google.png)
![Microsoft Academico](/xmlui/themes/Mirage2/images/uji/logo_microsoft.png)
Metadata
Show full item recordcomunitat-uji-handle:10234/9
comunitat-uji-handle2:10234/7013
comunitat-uji-handle3:10234/8638
comunitat-uji-handle4:
INVESTIGACIONThis resource is restricted
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2011.11.047 |
Metadata
Title
Validation of an analytical methodology to quantify melamine in body fluids using micellar liquid chromatographyAuthor (s)
Date
2012-01Publisher
ElsevierType
info:eu-repo/semantics/articlePublisher version
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039914011010290Version
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionSubject
Abstract
Measurement of urine and plasma melamine-concentration is helpful in confirming melamine-associated renal diseases. A chromatographic procedure using a C18 column and a micellar mobile phase of sodium dodecyl sulphate ... [+]
Measurement of urine and plasma melamine-concentration is helpful in confirming melamine-associated renal diseases. A chromatographic procedure using a C18 column and a micellar mobile phase of sodium dodecyl sulphate (0.2 M), buffered at pH 3 and detection set at 210 nm, was reported for the resolution and quantification of melamine in plasma and urine. In this work, direct injection was used, thus avoiding long extraction and experimental procedures. Melamine was eluted in nearly 6.3 min without overlapping the protein band or other endogenous compounds. The optimal mobile phase composition was taken by studying the influence of each chromatographic parameter. Validation was satisfactorily performed following the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), in terms of: linearity (0.25–25 ppm; r2 > 0.9995 in both cases), sensitivity, limit of detection (50 ppb), limit of quantification (250 ppb), intra- and inter-day precision (R.S.D. 0.7–10.2% and 1.0–9.1%, respectively) and recovery, calculated as accuracy (85.7–103.8% and 94.8–103.6%, respectively) and robustness (R.S.D. < 7.1%). The suggested methodology has been applied to the analysis of real samples of volunteers, and no melamine was found in any of them. [-]
Is part of
Talanta Volume 88, 15 January 2012Rights
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
This item appears in the folowing collection(s)
- QFA_Articles [825]