Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorRoselló, Salvador
dc.contributor.authorSerrano, Elena
dc.contributor.authorValcárcel, Mercedes
dc.contributor.authorCebolla-Cornejo, Jaime
dc.contributor.authorBeltran Arandes, Joaquin
dc.contributor.authorNuez Viñals, Fernando
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-30T15:27:35Z
dc.date.available2012-10-30T15:27:35Z
dc.date.issued2011-02
dc.identifier.issn0021-8561
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10234/50359
dc.description.abstractTaste and aroma related compounds have been analyzed in a collection of four traditional varieties and two tomato hybrids, representing a wide variability in fruit shape and color, grown in different environments: screenhouse and open field. Protected cultivation tended to show lower sugar concentration (fructose and glucose) but similar acid contents (citric, malic, and glutamic acids). The decreased levels of sucrose equivalents and the similar ratios of sucrose equivalents to citric or glutamic acid contents indicated that protected cultivation, despite being useful to reduce the incidence of pests and viral diseases, reduces the organoleptic quality. Additionally, it doubles the interaccession variability and increased the level of intra-accession variability. In the case of aroma, the genotypic effect was considerably higher than the environmental component on the 12 main volatiles analyzed. Only hexanal and methyl salicylate were significantly affected by environment, while 10 out of 12 volatiles were affected by the genotype. Biplot analysis showed that, even in considerably different environments, it is possible to identify genotype-dependent main aroma profiles. In the case of 13 background volatiles, the environment showed no significant effects and the genotypic effect was lower, though it is possible to identify genotypic trends in background notes.ca_CA
dc.format.extent11 p.ca_CA
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfca_CA
dc.language.isoengca_CA
dc.publisher© 2011 American Chemical Societyca_CA
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (Febr. 2011),vol. 59, no. 6, 2440–2450ca_CA
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/*
dc.subjectSolanum section Lycopersiconca_CA
dc.subjectsugarca_CA
dc.subjectacidca_CA
dc.subjectvolatileca_CA
dc.subjectvariabilityca_CA
dc.subjectqualityca_CA
dc.subjectgenetic resourcesca_CA
dc.titleEvaluation of genotype and environment effects on taste and aroma flavor components of Spanish fresh tomato varietiesca_CA
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca_CA
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf1045427
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessca_CA
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttp://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jf1045427?prevSearch=%255BTitle%253A%2BEvaluation%2Bof%2Bgenotype%2Band%2Benvironment%2Beffects%2Bon%2Btaste%2Band%2Baroma%2Bflavor%2Bcomponents%2Bof%2BSpanish%2Bfresh%2Btomato%2Bvarieties%255D&searchHistoryKey=ca_CA


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem