Evaluation of genotype and environment effects on taste and aroma flavor components of Spanish fresh tomato varieties
Impact
Scholar |
Other documents of the author: Roselló, Salvador; Serrano, Elena; Valcárcel, Mercedes; Cebolla-Cornejo, Jaime; Beltran Arandes, Joaquin; Nuez Viñals, Fernando
Metadata
Show full item recordcomunitat-uji-handle:10234/9
comunitat-uji-handle2:10234/33596
comunitat-uji-handle3:10234/33597
comunitat-uji-handle4:
INVESTIGACIONThis resource is restricted
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf1045427 |
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of genotype and environment effects on taste and aroma flavor components of Spanish fresh tomato varietiesAuthor (s)
Date
2011-02Publisher
© 2011 American Chemical SocietyISSN
0021-8561Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/articlePublisher version
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jf1045427?prevSearch=%255BTitle%253A%2BEvalu ...Subject
Abstract
Taste and aroma related compounds have been analyzed in a collection of four traditional varieties and two tomato hybrids, representing a wide variability in fruit shape and color, grown in different environments: ... [+]
Taste and aroma related compounds have been analyzed in a collection of four traditional varieties and two tomato hybrids, representing a wide variability in fruit shape and color, grown in different environments: screenhouse and open field. Protected cultivation tended to show lower sugar concentration (fructose and glucose) but similar acid contents (citric, malic, and glutamic acids). The decreased levels of sucrose equivalents and the similar ratios of sucrose equivalents to citric or glutamic acid contents indicated that protected cultivation, despite being useful to reduce the incidence of pests and viral diseases, reduces the organoleptic quality. Additionally, it doubles the interaccession variability and increased the level of intra-accession variability. In the case of aroma, the genotypic effect was considerably higher than the environmental component on the 12 main volatiles analyzed. Only hexanal and methyl salicylate were significantly affected by environment, while 10 out of 12 volatiles were affected by the genotype. Biplot analysis showed that, even in considerably different environments, it is possible to identify genotype-dependent main aroma profiles. In the case of 13 background volatiles, the environment showed no significant effects and the genotypic effect was lower, though it is possible to identify genotypic trends in background notes. [-]
Is part of
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (Febr. 2011),vol. 59, no. 6, 2440–2450Rights
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
This item appears in the folowing collection(s)
- IUPA_Articles [307]