A survey on uncertainty quantification in deep learning for financial time series prediction
Ver/ Abrir
Impacto
Scholar |
Otros documentos de la autoría: Blasco, Txus; Sánchez Garreta, Josep Salvador; García, Vicente
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemcomunitat-uji-handle:10234/9
comunitat-uji-handle2:10234/43662
comunitat-uji-handle3:10234/43643
comunitat-uji-handle4:
INVESTIGACIONMetadatos
Título
A survey on uncertainty quantification in deep learning for financial time series predictionFecha de publicación
2024-01-28Editor
Elsevier Science DirectISSN
0925-2312; 1872-8286Cita bibliográfica
Blasco, T., Sánchez, J. S., & García, V. (2024). A survey on uncertainty quantification in deep learning for financial time series prediction. Neurocomputing, 127339.Tipo de documento
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleVersión
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPalabras clave / Materias
Resumen
Investors make decisions about buying and selling a financial asset based on available information. The traditional approach in Deep Learning when trying to predict the behavior of an asset is to take a price history, ... [+]
Investors make decisions about buying and selling a financial asset based on available information. The traditional approach in Deep Learning when trying to predict the behavior of an asset is to take a price history, train a model, and forecast one single price in the near future. This is called the frequentist perspective. Uncertainty Quantification is an alternative in which models manage a probability distribution for prediction. It provides investors with more information than the traditional frequentist way, so they can consider the risk of making or not making a certain decision. We systematically reviewed the existing literature on Uncertainty Quantification methods in Deep Learning to predict the behavior of financial assets, such as foreign exchange, stock market, cryptocurrencies and others. The article discusses types of model, categories of financial assets, prediction characteristics and types of uncertainty. We found that, in general terms, references focus on price accuracy as a metric, although other metrics, such as trend accuracy, might be more appropriate. Very few authors analyze both epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty, and none analyze in depth how to decouple them. The time period analyzed includes the years 2001 to 2022. [-]
Publicado en
Neurocomputing, Vol. 576, (April 2024)Derechos de acceso
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Aparece en las colecciones
- LSI_Articles [362]
- INIT_Articles [751]