A comparative account of indigenous participation in extractive projects: The challenge of achieving Free, Prior and Informed Consent.
![Thumbnail](/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10234/203376/Klein_comparative.pdf.jpg?sequence=4&isAllowed=y)
Ver/ Abrir
Impacto
![Google Scholar](/xmlui/themes/Mirage2/images/uji/logo_google.png)
![Microsoft Academico](/xmlui/themes/Mirage2/images/uji/logo_microsoft.png)
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemcomunitat-uji-handle:10234/9
comunitat-uji-handle2:10234/8648
comunitat-uji-handle3:10234/8649
comunitat-uji-handle4:
INVESTIGACIONMetadatos
Título
A comparative account of indigenous participation in extractive projects: The challenge of achieving Free, Prior and Informed Consent.Fecha de publicación
2023-07Editor
ElsevierISSN
2214-790XCita bibliográfica
Laurence Klein, María Jesús Muñoz-Torres, María Ángeles Fernández-Izquierdo, A comparative account of indigenous participation in extractive projects: The challenge of achieving Free, Prior and Informed Consent., The Extractive Industries and Society, Volume 15, 2023, 101270, ISSN 2214-790X, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2023.101270.Tipo de documento
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleVersión de la editorial
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X2300059XVersión
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPalabras clave / Materias
Resumen
Indigenous peoples’ right to Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) has been recognised as an important principle to ensure their meaningful participation in decision-making processes related to extractive projects. ... [+]
Indigenous peoples’ right to Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) has been recognised as an important principle to ensure their meaningful participation in decision-making processes related to extractive projects. Yet, many companies grapple with their duty to engage in good faith consultations with indigenous peoples implied by the standard of human rights due diligence. Instead of understanding project impacts from the perspective of these peoples, companies generally conduct one-off environmental or social impact assessments or sign private agreements with communities that look at project impacts merely in terms of the reputational, operational, legal, and financial costs they represent to them. Human Rights Impact Assessments recognise that human rights conditions evolve and that companies need to consult with affected rights-holders throughout the project cycle to renew community consent on a regular basis. Indigenous peoples are also taking matters into their own hands by conducting Community-Controlled Impact Assessments or community consultations to move consent-based processes to the centre of negotiations with companies. By comparing local experiences of corporate-indigenous engagement in Canada, Guatemala, and Peru, we aim to determine if and how companies currently contribute to the implementation of FPIC in order to suggest a way forward towards greater corporate commitment to FPIC. [-]
Publicado en
The Extractive Industries and Society, vol. 15, (2023)Entidad financiadora
Luxembourg National Research Fund
Código del proyecto o subvención
12541494
Título del proyecto o subvención
AFR-PhD Grant Agreement 2018 | HRIPISD-Corporate respect for the human rights of indigenous peoples: towards inclusive sustainable development
Derechos de acceso
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Aparece en las colecciones
- COFIN_Articles [218]