Analysis of the Differential Efficacy of the Reduced Version Over the Extended Version of an Affective-Sexual Education Program for Adults with Intellectual Disabilities
![Thumbnail](/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10234/201700/83754.pdf.jpg?sequence=4&isAllowed=y)
View/ Open
Impact
![Google Scholar](/xmlui/themes/Mirage2/images/uji/logo_google.png)
![Microsoft Academico](/xmlui/themes/Mirage2/images/uji/logo_microsoft.png)
Metadata
Show full item recordcomunitat-uji-handle:10234/9
comunitat-uji-handle2:10234/8033
comunitat-uji-handle3:10234/8636
comunitat-uji-handle4:
INVESTIGACIONMetadata
Title
Analysis of the Differential Efficacy of the Reduced Version Over the Extended Version of an Affective-Sexual Education Program for Adults with Intellectual DisabilitiesAuthor (s)
Date
2023Publisher
SpringerBibliographic citation
Gil-Llario, M.D., Fernández-García, O., Huedo-Medina, T.B. et al. Analysis of the Differential Efficacy of the Reduced Version Over the Extended Version of an Affective-Sexual Education Program for Adults with Intellectual Disabilities. Arch Sex Behav 52, 135–147 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02407-3Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAbstract
Recently, with the increase in demand, multiple intervention proposals aimed at improving the sexual health of people with intellectual
disabilities have emerged. Among them is the SALUDIVERSEX program, which takes ... [+]
Recently, with the increase in demand, multiple intervention proposals aimed at improving the sexual health of people with intellectual
disabilities have emerged. Among them is the SALUDIVERSEX program, which takes a positive approach to sexuality. It has an
extended version, consisting of 16 sessions and whose efcacy has already been proven, and a reduced version of 10 sessions. Thus,
the present study aimed to test the diferential efcacy of the two versions. A total of 208 participants (103 women and 105 men) aged
between 19 and 67 years (M=37.23, SD=10.66) completed a battery of instruments before and after the intervention. Statistical
analyses showed that users who participated in the reduced version of the program presented a signifcantly higher rate of improvement
in their sexual behaviors compared to those who participated in the extended version (Sexual response: β10=− 0.46±0.19, p=.034;
Sex practices: β10=− 0.52±0.23, p=.037; Use condoms: β10=− 1.56±0.59, p=.017), as well as a signifcantly higher decrease in
the risk of sufering sexual abuse (β10=3.95±0.64, p<.001). However, no statistically signifcant diferences in sexuality knowledge
were obtained with respect to the improvement between the two versions (β10=− 0.09±1.21, p=.94). Meanwhile, the professionals
who applied the program found that those who participated in the reduced version, although they presented a signifcantly greater
increase in their knowledge about privacy (β10=− 0.48±0.08, p<.001), did not improve their concerns about their inappropriate
sexual behaviors as much as the users of the extended version (β10=− 1.35±0.21, p<.001). Thus, although both versions were efective, the reduced version seems to do so to a greater extent and in a shorter time, which makes it the more recommendable option. [-]
Is part of
Archives of Sexual Behavior (2023) 52Funder Name
Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Project code
RTI2018-095538-B-I00
Rights
© The Author(s) 2022
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
This item appears in the folowing collection(s)
- PSB_Articles [1322]