Theoretical adequacy, methodological quality and efficacy of online interventions targeting resilience: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Ver/ Abrir
Impacto
Scholar |
Otros documentos de la autoría: Díaz-García, Amanda; Franke, Marvin; HERRERO ROMERO, ROCIO; Ebert, David Daniel; Botella, Cristina
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemcomunitat-uji-handle:10234/9
comunitat-uji-handle2:10234/8033
comunitat-uji-handle3:10234/8636
comunitat-uji-handle4:
INVESTIGACIONMetadatos
Título
Theoretical adequacy, methodological quality and efficacy of online interventions targeting resilience: a systematic review and meta-analysisAutoría
Fecha de publicación
2021-07-07Editor
Oxford University PressCita bibliográfica
DÍAZ-GARCÍA, Amanda, et al. Theoretical adequacy, methodological quality and efficacy of online interventions targeting resilience: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European journal of public health, 2021, 31.Supplement_1: i11-i18.Tipo de documento
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleVersión
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPalabras clave / Materias
Resumen
Background
There is a growing interest in the promotion of mental health, and concepts as resilience are re-emerging and taking relevance. In addition, Information and Communication Technologies can provide potential ... [+]
Background
There is a growing interest in the promotion of mental health, and concepts as resilience are re-emerging and taking relevance. In addition, Information and Communication Technologies can provide potential benefits in the field of mental health, and the treatment of mental disorders in particular. This study aims to synthesize the evidence of internet-based resilience interventions, analyzing the theoretical adequacy, methodological quality and efficacy.
Methods
A systematic search was performed. The eligibility criteria stated for this article were: randomized controlled trials targeted at adults or adolescents and including any psychological intervention focussing on resilience in its rationale or design. Studies with direct (e.g. resilience scales) and proximal resilience measures (e.g. scales on well-being) were included. Risk of bias was assessed for each trial using Cochrane’s Collaboration Tool. Two reviewers worked independently in order to identify potential articles. A total of 11 articles were selected. A random-effects pooling model using the Hartung–Knapp–Sidik–Jonkman method based on direct and proximal resilience measures at post-test was used.
Results
The overall effects of online resilience training compared to control groups at post-test were not significant; the effect size concerning the improvement of resilience was g=0.12 (95% CI: −0.14 to 0.38). In addition, a potential association between the type of outcome and the effect size could be revealed.
Conclusions
The results of the present meta-analysis showed that the overall effect of online resilience trainings was not significant. Nonetheless, a tendency for a higher benefit for resilience was found in the studies with a clear assessment theory, indicating some promising effects. [-]
Publicado en
European Journal of Public Health, Vol. 31, Supplement 1, i11–i18Entidad financiadora
Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Spain) | Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (FPI-MINECO) | European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme
Código del proyecto o subvención
PSI2014–54172-R | BES-2015-072360 | 634757
Título del proyecto o subvención
ICare—Integrating Technology into Mental Health Care in Europe
Derechos de acceso
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Aparece en las colecciones
- PSB_Articles [1325]
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como: The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/),
which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.