Plant‑feeding may explain why the generalist predator Euseius stipulatus does better on less defended citrus plants but Tetranychus‑specialists Neoseiulus californicus and Phytoseiulus persimilis do not
![Thumbnail](/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10234/191656/Cruz_2021_plant.pdf.jpg?sequence=5&isAllowed=y)
Visualitza/
Impacte
![Google Scholar](/xmlui/themes/Mirage2/images/uji/logo_google.png)
![Microsoft Academico](/xmlui/themes/Mirage2/images/uji/logo_microsoft.png)
Metadades
Mostra el registre complet de l'elementcomunitat-uji-handle:10234/9
comunitat-uji-handle2:10234/2508
comunitat-uji-handle3:10234/6999
comunitat-uji-handle4:
INVESTIGACIONMetadades
Títol
Plant‑feeding may explain why the generalist predator Euseius stipulatus does better on less defended citrus plants but Tetranychus‑specialists Neoseiulus californicus and Phytoseiulus persimilis do notAutoria
Data de publicació
2021-01-22Editor
SpringerCita bibliogràfica
Cruz-Miralles, J., Cabedo-López, M., Guzzo, M. et al. Plant-feeding may explain why the generalist predator Euseius stipulatus does better on less defended citrus plants but Tetranychus-specialists Neoseiulus californicus and Phytoseiulus persimilis do not. Exp Appl Acarol 83, 167–182 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-020-00588-xTipus de document
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleVersió
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionParaules clau / Matèries
Resum
The generalist predator Euseius stipulatus (Athias-Henriot) and the Tetranychidae-specialist predators Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) and Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot play a key role in the regulation ... [+]
The generalist predator Euseius stipulatus (Athias-Henriot) and the Tetranychidae-specialist predators Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) and Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot play a key role in the regulation of Tetranychus urticae Koch in Spanish citrus orchards.
Previous studies have shown that sour orange (Citrus aurantium L.) and Cleopatra mandarin (Citrus reshni hort. ex Tan.) display extreme resistance and susceptibility to T. urticae,
respectively. When ofered a choice between these two genotypes infested by T. urticae,
E. stipulatus preferred Cleopatra mandarin, whereas the specialists did not show any preference. The present study was undertaken to check whether these preferences could be
related to the feeding of E. stipulatus on the host plant and/or to diferences in prey feeding
on the two plants. Our results demonstrate that E. stipulatus is a zoophytophagous mite,
which can engage in direct plant feeding in sour orange and Cleopatra mandarin, whereas
neither N. californicus nor P. persimilis do so. Whereas Cleopatra mandarin provided a
higher-quality prey/feeding substrate for E. stipulatus, which may be related to its phytophagy, no diferences were observed for the two specialists. As higher constitutive and
faster inducible defense against T. urticae in sour orange relative to Cleopatra mandarin
plants result in sour orange supporting lower T. urticae densities and plant damage, our
results demonstrate that pest regulation by specialist natural enemies may be more efective
when prey feed on better defended plants. [-]
Publicat a
Experimental and Applied Acarology (2021) 83:167–182Dades relacionades
http://hdl.handle.net/10234/191655Entitat finançadora
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
Codi del projecte o subvenció
AGL2014-55616-C3 | BES-2015-074570 | AGL2015-64990-2R | RTI2018-094350-B-C33
Drets d'accés
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Apareix a les col.leccions
- MAT_Articles [765]
- CAMN_Articles [567]
Els següents fitxers sobre la llicència estan associats a aquest element: