Parents’ Perception of the Complementary Baby-Led Weaning Feeding Method: A Validation Study
View/ Open
Impact
Scholar |
Other documents of the author: Martí Solsona, Elena; González-Chordá, Victor M.; Andreu-Pejó, Laura; Cervera-Gasch, Agueda; Valero-Chillerón, María Jesús; Mena Tudela, Desirée
Metadata
Show full item recordcomunitat-uji-handle:10234/9
comunitat-uji-handle2:10234/36084
comunitat-uji-handle3:10234/36085
comunitat-uji-handle4:
INVESTIGACIONMetadata
Title
Parents’ Perception of the Complementary Baby-Led Weaning Feeding Method: A Validation StudyAuthor (s)
Date
2020Publisher
MDPIISSN
2039-4403Bibliographic citation
Martí-Solsona E, González-Chordá VM, Andreu-Pejo L, Cervera-Gasch Á, Valero-Chillerón MJ, Mena-Tudela D. Parents’ Perception of the Complementary Baby-Led Weaning Feeding Method: A Validation Study. Nursing Reports. 2020; 10(2):115-123.Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/articlePublisher version
https://www.mdpi.com/2039-4403/10/2/15Version
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionSubject
Abstract
This study aims to construct and validate a questionnaire that allows Parents’ Perceptions of
the complementary Baby-Led Weaning feeding method (PaPerc-BLW questionnaire) to be evaluated.
An instrumental design was ... [+]
This study aims to construct and validate a questionnaire that allows Parents’ Perceptions of
the complementary Baby-Led Weaning feeding method (PaPerc-BLW questionnaire) to be evaluated.
An instrumental design was used. Five child nutrition experts took part in the development and
content validity. The questionnaire was administered to a sample of 216 Spanish parents of infants
aged 0–6 months to determine psychometric properties (construct validity and internal consistency).
The factor analysis explained 65.12% of variance with three factors (Promoting infant autonomy and
development; Infant’s health; Parents’ fear to apply BLW), and internal consistency was α = 0.67.
The mean score of the PaPerc-BLW questionnaire for the total sample was 4.14 (DS = 0.64, 95%
CI = 4.06–4.23). Significant differences were found in the parents’ perception of baby-led weaning
feeding method based on variables as previous children (p ≤ 0.001). Otherwise, the sample included
in the study could bias the results, since 98.6% indicated that they were familiar with the BLW
method and 62% had previous experience Despite this limitation, the PaPerc-BLW questionnaire
offers adequate validity for evaluating parents’ perception of the baby-led weaning method. [-]
Is part of
Nursing Reports, 2020, vol. 10, no 2Investigation project
UJI-A2017-07Rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
This item appears in the folowing collection(s)
- IF_Articles [318]
- INF_Articles [277]
The following license files are associated with this item:
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).