Telemonitoring in chronic pain management using smartphone apps: A randomized controlled trial comparing usual assessment against app-based monitoring with and without clinical alarms
![Thumbnail](/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10234/190204/suso_2020_tele.pdf.jpg?sequence=5&isAllowed=y)
Ver/ Abrir
Impacto
![Google Scholar](/xmlui/themes/Mirage2/images/uji/logo_google.png)
![Microsoft Academico](/xmlui/themes/Mirage2/images/uji/logo_microsoft.png)
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemcomunitat-uji-handle:10234/9
comunitat-uji-handle2:10234/8033
comunitat-uji-handle3:10234/8636
comunitat-uji-handle4:
INVESTIGACIONMetadatos
Título
Telemonitoring in chronic pain management using smartphone apps: A randomized controlled trial comparing usual assessment against app-based monitoring with and without clinical alarmsAutoría
Fecha de publicación
2020-09-09Editor
MDPIISSN
1660-4601Cita bibliográfica
SUSO-RIBERA, Carlos, et al. Telemonitoring in Chronic Pain Management Using Smartphone Apps: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Usual Assessment Against App-Based Monitoring with and without Clinical Alarms. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, vol. 17, no 18, p. 6568.Tipo de documento
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleVersión de la editorial
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6568Versión
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPalabras clave / Materias
Resumen
Background. The usefulness of mHealth in helping to target face-to-face interventions
for chronic pain more effectively remains unclear. In the present study, we aim to test whether the
Pain Monitor mobile phone ... [+]
Background. The usefulness of mHealth in helping to target face-to-face interventions
for chronic pain more effectively remains unclear. In the present study, we aim to test whether the
Pain Monitor mobile phone application (app) is well accepted by clinicians, and can help improve
existent medical treatments for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Regarding this last goal,
we compared three treatment conditions, namely usual treatment, usual treatment with an app
without alarms and usual treatment with an app with alarms. All treatments lasted one month.
The three treatments were compared for all outcomes, i.e., pain severity and interference, fatigue,
depressed mood, anxiety and anger. Methods. In this randomized controlled trial, the usual
monitoring method (i.e., onsite; n = 44) was compared with daily ecological momentary assessment
using the Pain Monitor app—both with (n = 43) and without alarms (n = 45). Alarms were sent
to the clinicians in the presence of pre-established undesired clinical events and could be used to
make treatment adjustments throughout the one-month study. Results. With the exception of anger,
clinically significant changes (CSC; 30% improvement) were greater in the app + alarm condition
across outcomes (e.g., 43.6% of patients experienced a CSC in depressed mood in the app + alarm
condition, which occurred in less than 29% of patients in the other groups). The clinicians were
willing to use the app, especially the version with alarms. Conclusions. The use of apps may have
some benefits in individual health care, especially when using alarms to tailor treatments. [-]
Publicado en
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6568Derechos de acceso
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Aparece en las colecciones
- PSB_Articles [1326]
El ítem tiene asociados los siguientes ficheros de licencia: