Construction of scale models in industrial design: the irruption of additive manufacturing. Rubrics proposal for an objective evaluation
Ver/ Abrir
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemcomunitat-uji-handle:10234/9
comunitat-uji-handle2:10234/7034
comunitat-uji-handle3:10234/67820
comunitat-uji-handle4:
INVESTIGACIONMetadatos
Título
Construction of scale models in industrial design: the irruption of additive manufacturing. Rubrics proposal for an objective evaluationFecha de publicación
2019-06-01Editor
International Academy of Technology, Education and Development (IATED)ISBN
978-84-09-12031-4Cita bibliográfica
FELIP, F. ; GUAL, J. Construction of scale models in industrial design: the irruption of additive manufacturing. Rubrics proposal for an objective evaluation. En: EDULEARN19 (July 1-3, 2019, Palma, Mallorca, Spain) 11th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies. Conference Proceedings: IATED Academy, 2019, pp. 558-565. DOI 10.21125/edulearn.2019.0203, ISBN 978-84-09-12031-4Tipo de documento
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject; DatasetVersión de la editorial
https://library.iated.org/view/FELIP2019CONVersión
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPalabras clave / Materias
Resumen
Recent studies corroborate the progressive implementation of Additive Manufacturing technologies (commonly known as 3D printing) in education, demonstrating several advantages. In the field of industrial design, the ... [+]
Recent studies corroborate the progressive implementation of Additive Manufacturing technologies (commonly known as 3D printing) in education, demonstrating several advantages. In the field of industrial design, the development of models during the design phase of product design helps designers in training to visualize their proposals. Today, 3D printing and traditional model-making techniques coexist in classrooms. With both techniques it is possible to achieve good results, but when it comes to evaluating them it is not so simple, since both ways of working are different and apparently the same evaluation criteria cannot be used in both cases, which could lead to comparative grievances.
This work presents a series of rubrics that can help to evaluate the student's models in an objective way and under equal conditions, independently of the technique used: traditional o 3D printing. In order to do this, we started from a rubric made to evaluate traditional models, which was tested during a couple of academic years in other subject. This rubric was adapted to create a new rubric, which allowed to evaluate models made by 3D printing, looking for equivalent criteria with the previous rubric to guarantee a fair evaluation of both ways of working.
The rubrics were tested experimentally in the subject ‘Prototypes: experimental workshop’, taught during the 4th year of the Bachelor's Degree in Industrial Design and Product Development Engineering at the Universitat Jaume I (Spain). Two groups of users assessed each work using these rubrics. The results showed, on the one hand, that both groups found it easy to evaluate the works using these rubrics, and on the other hand, that these rubrics allow for a fairly objective evaluation of the works, since the score obtained by both groups of users was very similar. [-]
Descripción
Comunicació presentada a EDULEARN2019, 11th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (July 1-3, 2019, Palma, Mallorca, Spain).
Publicado en
EDULEARN19 Proceedings 11th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (Palma, Spain. 1-3 July, 2019) : IATED, 2019. ISBN: 978-84-09-12031-4 / ISSN: 2340-1117 doi: 10.21125/edulearn.2019Proyecto de investigación
Universitat Jaume I. Educational Support Unit (U.S.E.) ( 3572/18)Derechos de acceso
All rights reserved. Copyright © 2019, IATED
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess