Prediction of spatial functional random processes: comparing functional and spatio-temporal kriging approaches
comunitat-uji-handle:10234/9
comunitat-uji-handle2:10234/7037
comunitat-uji-handle3:10234/8635
comunitat-uji-handle4:
INVESTIGACIONMetadata
Title
Prediction of spatial functional random processes: comparing functional and spatio-temporal kriging approachesDate
2019Publisher
Springer Berlin HeidelbergISSN
1436-3240; 1436-3259Bibliographic citation
STRANDBERG, Johan; DE LUNA, Sara Sjöstedt; MATEU, Jorge. Prediction of spatial functional random processes: comparing functional and spatio-temporal kriging approaches. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2019, vol. 33, núm. 10, p. 1699-1719Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/articlePublisher version
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00477-019-01705-yVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionSubject
Abstract
We present and compare functional and spatio-temporal (Sp.T.) kriging approaches to predict spatial functional randomprocesses (which can also be viewed as Sp.T. random processes). Comparisons with respect to comput ... [+]
We present and compare functional and spatio-temporal (Sp.T.) kriging approaches to predict spatial functional randomprocesses (which can also be viewed as Sp.T. random processes). Comparisons with respect to computational time andprediction performance via functional cross-validation is evaluated, mainly through a simulation study but also on a realdata set. We restrict comparisons to Sp.T. kriging versus ordinary kriging for functional data (OKFD), since the moreflexible functional kriging approaches pointwise functional kriging (PWFK) and the functional kriging total model coincidewith OKFD in several situations. Here we formulate conditions under which we show that OKFD and PWFK coincide.From the simulation study, it is concluded that the prediction performance of the two kriging approaches in general israther equal for stationary Sp.T. processes. However, functional kriging tends to perform better for small sample sizes,while Sp.T. kriging works better for large sizes. For non-stationary Sp.T. processes, with a common deterministic timetrend and/or time varying variances and dependence structure, OKFD performs better than Sp.T. kriging irrespective of thesample size. For all simulated cases, the computational time for OKFD was considerably lower compared to those for theSp.T. kriging methods [-]
Is part of
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2019, vol. 33, núm. 10, p. 1699-1719Investigation project
Open access funding provided by UmeaUniversity. This work was supported by the Swedish ResearchCouncil (Project id 340-2013-5203) and J.Mateu has been partiallyfunded by Grants MTM2016-78917-R from the Spanish Ministery ofScience, and P1-1B2015-40 from University Jaume IRights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
This item appears in the folowing collection(s)
- INIT_Articles [752]
- MAT_Articles [765]
The following license files are associated with this item:
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © The Author(s) 2019
This article is distributed under the terms of the CreativeCommons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, dis-tribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you giveappropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide alink to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes weremade.