Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorPalau, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorDomínguez Mafé, Eloy
dc.contributor.authorNúñez, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorRamón, José María
dc.contributor.authorLópez, Laura
dc.contributor.authorMelero, Joana
dc.contributor.authorBellver, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorChorro, Francisco J.
dc.contributor.authorBodí, Vicent
dc.contributor.authorBayes-Genis, Antoni
dc.contributor.authorSanchis, Juan
dc.contributor.authorNúñez, Julio
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-19T12:21:44Z
dc.date.available2017-06-19T12:21:44Z
dc.date.issued2017-06
dc.identifier.citationPALAU, Patricia, et al. Inspiratory Muscle Function and Exercise Capacity in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction. Journal of Cardiac Failure, Volume 23, Issue 6, June 2017, Pages 480–484.ca_CA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10234/168031
dc.description.abstractBackground Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a clinical syndrome characterized by impaired exercise capacity resulting from dyspnea and fatigue. The pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the exercise intolerance in HFpEF are not well established. We sought to evaluate the effects of inspiratory muscle function on exercise tolerance in symptomatic patients with HFpEF. Methods and Results A total of 74 stable symptomatic patients with HFpEF and New York Heart Association class II-III underwent a cardiopulmonary exercise test between June 2012 and May 2016. Inspiratory muscle weakness was defined as maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP)  <70% of normal predicted values. Pearson correlation coefficient and multivariate linear regression analysis were used to assess the association between percent of predicted MIP (pp-MIP) and maximal exercise capacity [measured by peak oxygen uptake (peak VO2) and percent of predicted peak VO2 (pp-peak VO2)]. Thirty-one patients (42%) displayed inspiratory muscle weakness. Mean (standard deviation) age was 72.5 ± 9.1 years, 53% were women, and 35.1% displayed New York Heart Association class III. Mean peak VO2 and pp-peak VO2 were 10 ± 2.8 mL•min•kg and 57.3 ± 13.8%, respectively. The median (interquartile range) of pp-MIP was 72% (58%–90%). pp-MIP was not correlated with peak VO2 (r = −0.047, P = .689) nor pp-peak VO2 (r = −0.078, P = .509). Furthermore, in multivariable analysis, pp-MIP showed no association with peak VO2 (β coefficient = 0.01, 95% confidence interval −0.01 to 0.03, P = .241) and pp-peak VO2 (β coefficient = −0.00, 95% confidence interval −0.10 to 0.10, P = .975). Conclusions In symptomatic elderly patients with HFpEF, we found that pp-MIP was not associated with either peak VO2 or pp-peak VO2.ca_CA
dc.format.extent4 p.ca_CA
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfca_CA
dc.language.isoengca_CA
dc.publisherElsevierca_CA
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Cardiac Failure Volume 23, Issue 6, June 2017ca_CA
dc.rights© 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.ca_CA
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/*
dc.subjectheart failure with preserved ejection fractionca_CA
dc.subjectinspiratory muscle functionca_CA
dc.subjectexercise capacityca_CA
dc.titleInspiratory Muscle Function and Exercise Capacity in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fractionca_CA
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca_CA
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.04.016
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessca_CA
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071916417301094ca_CA
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem