Evaluating the use of Pareto Efficiency to Optimize Non-Functional Requirements Satisfaction in i* Modeling
View/ Open
Impact
Scholar |
Other documents of the author: Zubcoff, Jose; Garrigós Fernández, Irene; Casteleyn, Sven; Mazón, Jose-Norberto; Aguilar Calderón, José Alfonso
Metadata
Show full item recordcomunitat-uji-handle:10234/9
comunitat-uji-handle2:10234/7038
comunitat-uji-handle3:10234/8634
comunitat-uji-handle4:
INVESTIGACIONMetadata
Title
Evaluating the use of Pareto Efficiency to Optimize Non-Functional Requirements Satisfaction in i* ModelingAuthor (s)
Date
2016-01xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-edition
Versió post-print de l'autorPublisher
IEEE XploreISSN
1548-0992Bibliographic citation
ZUBCOFF, J. J., et al. Evaluating the use of Pareto Efficiency to Optimize Non-Functional Requirements Satisfaction in i* Modeling. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 2016, 14.1: 331-338.Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/articlePublisher version
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=7430098Version
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionSubject
Abstract
Due to the large, heterogeneous audience of Web applications, and its rapidly changing expectations, holistic requirement analysis approaches are crucial to ensure the success of Web engineering projects. To increase ... [+]
Due to the large, heterogeneous audience of Web applications, and its rapidly changing expectations, holistic requirement analysis approaches are crucial to ensure the success of Web engineering projects. To increase the quality of resulting Web applications, non-functional requirements (NFRs) must be considered. Satisfying them is a non-trivial task that depends on making decisions about which functional requirements (FRs) to implement, and how to prioritize the NFRs. A satisfactory solution is a trade-off, where competing NFRs must be balanced. In this paper, we outline how the Pareto efficiency can complement a goal-oriented requirement analysis modelling to evaluate and select optimal configurations of requirements for a Web application, while NFRs are balanced and maximized according to a priority list. We hereby focus on an empirical evaluation to verify whether our Pareto method improves the accuracy of design decisions during the requirements analysis phase, and/or if it reduces the time needed by designers. [-]
Is part of
IEEE Latin America Transactions, 2016, Volume:14 Issue:1Rights
© Copyright 2016 IEEE - All rights reserved.
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
This item appears in the folowing collection(s)
- LSI_Articles [361]