Fast gas chromatographic residue analysis in animal feed using split injection and atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation tandem mass spectrometry
Impact
Scholar |
Other documents of the author: Tienstra, M.; Portoles, Tania; Hernandez, Felix; Mol, Johannes G. J.
Metadata
Show full item recordcomunitat-uji-handle:10234/9
comunitat-uji-handle2:10234/7013
comunitat-uji-handle3:10234/8638
comunitat-uji-handle4:
INVESTIGACIONThis resource is restricted
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2015.10.032 |
Metadata
Title
Fast gas chromatographic residue analysis in animal feed using split injection and atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation tandem mass spectrometryDate
2015-11Publisher
ElsevierISSN
0021-9673Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/articlePublisher version
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021967315014909Version
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionSubject
Abstract
Significant speed improvement for instrumental runtime would make GC–MS much more attractive for determination of pesticides and contaminants and as complementary technique to LC–MS. This was the trigger to develop a ... [+]
Significant speed improvement for instrumental runtime would make GC–MS much more attractive for determination of pesticides and contaminants and as complementary technique to LC–MS. This was the trigger to develop a fast method (time between injections less than 10 min) for the determination of pesticides and PCBs that are not (or less) amenable to LC–MS. A key factor in achieving shorter analysis time was the use of split injection (1:10) which allowed the use of a much higher initial GC oven temperature. A shorter column (15 m), higher temperature ramp, and higher carrier gas flow rate (6 mL/min) further contributed to analysis-time reduction. Chromatographic resolution was slightly compromised but still well fit-for-purpose. Due to the high sensitivity of the technique used (GC–APCI-triple quadrupole MS/MS), quantification and identification were still possible down to the 10 μg/kg level, which was demonstrated by successful validation of the method for complex feed matrices according to EU guidelines. Other advantages of the method included a better compatibility of acetonitrile extracts (e.g. QuEChERS) with GC, and a reduced transfer of co-extractants into the GC column and mass spectrometer. [-]
Is part of
Journal of Chromatography A, 2015, vol. 1422Rights
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
This item appears in the folowing collection(s)
- QFA_Articles [819]