Comparison of the degree of creativity in the design outcomes using different design methods
Ver/ Abrir
Impacto
Scholar |
Otros documentos de la autoría: Chulvi, Vicente; Mulet, Elena; Chakrabarti, Amaresh; López Mesa, María Belinda; González-Cruz, Carmen
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemcomunitat-uji-handle:10234/9
comunitat-uji-handle2:10234/7035
comunitat-uji-handle3:10234/8617
comunitat-uji-handle4:
INVESTIGACIONMetadatos
Título
Comparison of the degree of creativity in the design outcomes using different design methodsAutoría
Fecha de publicación
2012Editor
Taylor & FrancisISSN
0954-4828Cita bibliográfica
Vicente Chulvi , Elena Mulet , Amaresh Chakrabarti , Belinda López-Mesa & Carmen González-Cruz (2012): Comparison of the degree of creativity in the design outcomes using different design methods, Journal of Engineering Design, 23:4, 241-269Tipo de documento
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleVersión de la editorial
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09544828.2011.624501#.UZoiVLVA1uIPalabras clave / Materias
Resumen
This work analyses the influence of several design methods on the degree of creativity of the design outcome. A design experiment has been carried out in which the participants were divided into four teams of three ... [+]
This work analyses the influence of several design methods on the degree of creativity of the design outcome. A design experiment has been carried out in which the participants were divided into four teams of three members, and each team was asked to work applying different design methods. The selected methods were Brainstorming, Functional Analysis, and SCAMPER method. The ‘degree of creativity’ of each design outcome is assessed by means of a questionnaire offered to a number of experts and by means of three different metrics: the metric of Moss, the metric of Sarkar and Chakrabarti, and the evaluation of innovative potential. The three metrics share the property of measuring the creativity as a combination of the degree of novelty and the degree of usefulness. The results show that Brainstorming provides more creative outcomes than when no method is applied, while this is not proved for SCAMPER and Functional Analysis. [-]
Publicado en
Journal of Engineering Design, 2012, vol. 23, num. 4, Special Issue: Design CreativityDerechos de acceso
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Aparece en las colecciones
- EMC_Articles [823]