Problemas resueltos de análisis de riesgos en instalaciones

Abstract

Being able to define which products are creative and which are not in a totally objective way with just one rater is of great importance. Accordingly, this study was conducted with the aim of identifying which methods of evaluating product creativity respond best to the requirements established for a method, namely, it must be useful, objective and simple to apply in enterprises. Likewise, this work also seeks to determine their shortcomings and the possible modifications or adaptations needed to correct them. To accomplish this goal, three known methods of evaluating creativity were analysed and applied to five products in order to determine their creative value, by means of a single rater. The findings are validated by evaluating creativity through questionnaires answered by experts in order to obtain a set of reference values for each parameter that creativity depends on. The analysis of the results, both graphically and numerically, reveals a tendency of the different metrics to display similar results, although they do not coincide in absolute terms due to the different scales and formats used for each metric. The conclusions show the most common shortcomings when it comes to evaluating creativity and, therefore, being able to propose global improvements that should be implemented in order to create a metric for objective creativity.