Towards Harmonization or Standardization in Governmental Accounting? The International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board Experience
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemcomunitat-uji-handle:10234/9
comunitat-uji-handle2:10234/8648
comunitat-uji-handle3:10234/146205
comunitat-uji-handle4:
INVESTIGACIONEste recurso está restringido
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429441622 |
Metadatos
Título
Towards Harmonization or Standardization in Governmental Accounting? The International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board ExperienceAutoría
Fecha de publicación
2020Editor
RoutledgeCita bibliográfica
Fuertes, Iluminada. "Towards harmonization or standardization in governmental accounting? The international public sector accounting standards board experience." Institutions and Governance in Comparative Policy Analysis Studies. Routledge, 2020. 246-264.Tipo de documento
info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPartVersión
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPalabras clave / Materias
Resumen
The main difference between harmonization and standardization processes lies in the degree of strictness of the accounting standards. Harmonization involves a reduction in accounting variations, while standardization ... [+]
The main difference between harmonization and standardization processes lies in the degree of strictness of the accounting standards. Harmonization involves a reduction in accounting variations, while standardization entails moving towards the eradication of any variation. This distinction provides the basis for the present study. The purpose of this study is twofold: to analyse the degree of strictness of the IPSASs and to identify the sources of accounting diversity so that the potential of comparability of that international accounting framework can be evaluated. The methodology used enables areas of harmony or disharmony to be identified for IPSASB harmonization purposes. The results show that, given its high degree of regulatory strictness, the IPSASs model is a standardizing model. Potential sources of diversity are identified in areas such as capital assets as well as new research directions in the public sector formal harmonization. [-]
Publicado en
Geva-May, I., Peters, B. G., & Muhleisen, J. (Eds.). (2020). Institutions and Governance in Comparative Policy Analysis Studies. Routledge. DOI https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429441622Derechos de acceso
© 2020 Taylor & Francis Group
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
Aparece en las colecciones
Ítems relacionados
Mostrando ítems relacionados por Título, autoría o Palabra clave.
-
Accounting regulations of non profit organizations
Gil Olivares, Amanda Universitat Jaume I (2014-07-17)In this work we will study the accounting of non-profit organizations. This sector is very heterogeneous and this is in continuous development. These organizations are characterized principally by the pursuit of the social ... -
Material flow cost accounting
Segarra Piera, Laura Universitat Jaume I (2018-11-14)The final degree project objective is to carry out, a theoretical and practical analysis of the barriers, the economic and environmental benefit of MFCA tool implementation in the companies. Firstly, it has been developed ... -
Agronomists and accounting. The beginnings of capitalist rationalisation on the farm (1800-1850)
Depecker, Thomas; Joly, Nathalie Sociedad Española de Historia Agraria (SEHA) (2015-04)At the dawn of the nineteenth century numerous debates took place on the development of capita-list agriculture and the ways of making as much profit as possible from farm land. Until now this subject has hardly been ...