Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorCañas Recacha, Eugeni
dc.contributor.authorDíaz, M.
dc.contributor.authorAlcázar, C.
dc.contributor.authorOrts Tarí, María José
dc.contributor.authorMoreno, Rodrigo
dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Vilches, Enrique
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-27T07:44:20Z
dc.date.available2022-09-27T07:44:20Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-11
dc.identifier.citationCañas, E., Díaz, M., Alcázar, C., Orts, M. J., Moreno, R., & Sánchez, E. (2020). Comparison of different silica sources in the development of plasma sprayed 45S5 bioactive glass coatings. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 544, 120164.ca_CA
dc.identifier.issn0022-3093
dc.identifier.issn1873-4812
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10234/199825
dc.description.abstract45S5 bioactive glass coatings were deposited by plasma spraying from liquid feedstocks. In these feedstocks, the SiO2 needed to achieve the 45S5 bioactive glass composition has been provided either as tetraethyl orthosilicate (typical precursor of glasses by sol–gel), or as colloidal silica suspension or mixtures of both sources. The synthesised materials were analysed in terms of rheology and sedimentation tests, and subsequently deposited onto metallic substrates under two different spraying distances. The resulting coatings were characterised on the basis of microstructure and phase nature. All feedstocks developed preserved the composition of the 45S5 bioactive glass and showed adequate viscosity and stability to be transported and injected into the plasma plume. However, different coating microstructures were achieved when using tetraethyl orthosilicate or colloidal silica suspensions. Besides, regardless the source of silica an improvement of the coatings microstructure and phase nature have also been observed when the spraying distance was significantly reduced.ca_CA
dc.format.extent36 p.ca_CA
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfca_CA
dc.language.isoengca_CA
dc.publisherElsevierca_CA
dc.publisherNorth-Hollandca_CA
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Non-Crystalline Solids. Volume 544, 15 September 2020, 120164ca_CA
dc.rights0022-3093/ © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.ca_CA
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ca_CA
dc.subject45S5 bioactive glassca_CA
dc.subjectplasma sprayingca_CA
dc.subjectsilicaca_CA
dc.subjectglass suspensionca_CA
dc.subjectglass solutionca_CA
dc.subjectcoating microstructureca_CA
dc.titleComparison of different silica sources in the development of plasma sprayed 45S5 bioactive glass coatingsca_CA
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca_CA
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2020.120164
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessca_CA
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionca_CA
project.funder.nameUniversitat Jaume Ica_CA
project.funder.nameMinisterio de Economía, Industria y Competitividadca_CA
oaire.awardNumberPREDOC/2015/50ca_CA
oaire.awardNumberMAT2015-67586-C3-Rca_CA


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

0022-3093/ © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como: 0022-3093/ © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.