Mostra el registre parcial de l'element
Implications of the electric vehicle manufacturers’ decision to mass adopt lithium-iron phosphate batteries
dc.contributor.author | Walvekar, Harsha | |
dc.contributor.author | Beltran, Hector | |
dc.contributor.author | Sripad, Shashank | |
dc.contributor.author | Pecht, Michael | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-09-01T11:32:53Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-09-01T11:32:53Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-06-13 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Walvekar, H., Beltran, H., Sripad, S., & Pecht, M. (2022). Implications of the Electric Vehicle Manufacturers’ Decision to Mass Adopt Lithium-Iron Phosphate Batteries. IEEE Access, 10, 63834-63843. | ca_CA |
dc.identifier.issn | 2169-3536 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10234/199070 | |
dc.description.abstract | Lithium-ion batteries are the ubiquitous energy storage device of choice in portable electronics and more recently, in electric vehicles. However, there are numerous lithium-ion battery chemistries and in particular, several cathode materials that have been commercialized over the last two decades, each with their own unique features and characteristics. In 2021, Tesla Inc. announced that it would change the cell chemistry used in its mass-market electric vehicles (EVs) from Lithium-Nickel-Cobalt-Aluminum-Oxide (NCA) to cells with Lithium-Iron-Phosphate (LFP) cathodes. Several other automakers have followed this trend by announcing their own plans to move their EV production to LFP. One of the reasons stated for this transition was to address issues with the nickel and cobalt supply chains. In this paper, we examine the trend of adopting LFP for mass-market electric vehicles, explore alternative reasons behind this transition, and analyze the effects this change will have on consumers. | ca_CA |
dc.format.extent | 10 p. | ca_CA |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | ca_CA |
dc.language.iso | eng | ca_CA |
dc.publisher | IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) | ca_CA |
dc.relation.isPartOf | IEEE Access, Volume 10 (2022) | ca_CA |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | ca_CA |
dc.subject | electric vehicles | ca_CA |
dc.subject | lithium-ion batteries | ca_CA |
dc.subject | battery performance | ca_CA |
dc.subject | market trends | ca_CA |
dc.title | Implications of the electric vehicle manufacturers’ decision to mass adopt lithium-iron phosphate batteries | ca_CA |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | ca_CA |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3182726 | |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | ca_CA |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | ca_CA |
project.funder.name | Universitat Jaume I | ca_CA |
project.funder.name | Generalitat Valenciana | ca_CA |
project.funder.name | Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering (CALCE), University of Maryland | ca_CA |
project.funder.name | Centre for Advances in Reliability and Safety (Innovation and Technology Commission of The Hong Kong SAR Government) | ca_CA |
oaire.awardNumber | UJI-B2021-35 | ca_CA |
oaire.awardNumber | CIBEST/2021/54 | ca_CA |
Fitxers en aquest element
Aquest element apareix en la col·lecció o col·leccions següent(s)
-
ESID_Articles [477]