Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorBadía, José
dc.contributor.authorLeón, Germán
dc.contributor.authorBELLOCH, JOSE A.
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Valderas, Mario
dc.contributor.authorLINDOSO, ALMUDENA
dc.contributor.authorEntrena, Luis
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-26T11:27:05Z
dc.date.available2022-05-26T11:27:05Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-16
dc.identifier.citationJ. M. Badia, G. Leon, J. A. Belloch, M. Garcia-Valderas, A. Lindoso and L. Entrena, "Comparison of Parallel Implementation Strategies in GPU-Accelerated System-on-Chip Under Proton Irradiation," in IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 444-452, March 2022, doi: 10.1109/TNS.2021.3128722.ca_CA
dc.identifier.issn0018-9499
dc.identifier.issn1558-1578
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10234/197826
dc.description.abstractCommercial off-the-shelf (COTS) system-on-chip (SoC) are becoming widespread in embedded systems. Many of them include a multicore central processing unit (CPU) and a high-end graphics processing unit (GPU). They combine high computational performance with low power consumption and flexible multilevel parallelism. This kind of device is also being considered for radiation environments where large amounts of data must be processed or compute-intensive applications must be executed. In this article, we compare three different strategies to perform matrix multiplication in the GPU of a Tegra TK1 SoC. Our aim is to analyze how the different use of the resources of the GPU influences not only the computational performance of the algorithm, but also its radiation sensitivity. Radiation experiments with protons were performed to compare the behavior of the three strategies. Experimental results show that most of the errors force a reboot of the platform. The number of errors is directly related with how the algorithms use the internal memories of the GPU and increases with the matrix size. It is also related with the number of transactions with the global memory, which in our experiments is not affected by the radiation. Results show that the smallest cross section is obtained with the fastest algorithm, even if it uses the cores of the GPU more intensively.ca_CA
dc.format.extent9 p.ca_CA
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfca_CA
dc.language.isoengca_CA
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineersca_CA
dc.publisherIEEEca_CA
dc.relation.isPartOfIEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science ( Volume: 69, Issue: 3, March 2022)ca_CA
dc.rights0018-9499 © 2021 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission.ca_CA
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ca_CA
dc.subjectembedded systemsca_CA
dc.subjectproton irradiationca_CA
dc.subjectparallelizationca_CA
dc.subjectgraphics processing unit (GPU)ca_CA
dc.subjectperformance evaluationca_CA
dc.subjectprotonsca_CA
dc.subjectsensitivityca_CA
dc.subjectradiation effectsca_CA
dc.subjectinstruction setsca_CA
dc.subjectcomputer architectureca_CA
dc.titleComparison of Parallel Implementation Strategies in GPU-Accelerated System-on-Chip Under Proton Irradiationca_CA
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca_CA
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2021.3128722
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessca_CA
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionca_CA
project.funder.nameGeneralitat Valencianaca_CA
project.funder.nameUniversitat Jaume Ica_CA
project.funder.nameMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovaciónca_CA
oaire.awardNumberPROMETEO/2019/109ca_CA
oaire.awardNumbert UJIB2019-36ca_CA
oaire.awardNumberPID2019-106455GB-C21ca_CA
oaire.awardNumberPID2020-113656RB-C21ca_CA


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem