Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorVidal, Rosario
dc.contributor.authorAlberola-Borràs, Jaume-Adrià
dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Pantoja, Núria
dc.contributor.authorMora-Sero, Ivan
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-22T13:28:58Z
dc.date.available2021-03-22T13:28:58Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationVidal, R., Alberola‐Borràs, J.‐A., Sánchez‐Pantoja, N. and Mora‐Seró, I. (2021), Comparison of Perovskite Solar Cells with other Photovoltaics Technologies from the Point of View of Life Cycle Assessment. Adv. Energy Sustainability Res. 2000088. https://doi.org/10.1002/aesr.202000088ca_CA
dc.identifier.issn2699-9412
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10234/192664
dc.description.abstractA review of the life cycle sustainability of perovskite solar cells (PSCs) is presented, distinguishing results between simulated laboratory‐based and simulated industrial‐based PSCs, comparing this technology with the commercial photovoltaic (PV) technologies. Laboratory‐based perovskites are seriously affected by the unrealistic energy consumption of the deposition routes. Moreover, other hot spots such as lead and solvent toxicity are much less relevant. A cluster analysis of single‐junction PSCs allows us to differentiate two clusters, in one of them, the most numerous, environmental impacts are in a similar range to other thin film PVs. Despite more progress at the industrial scale being needed, the current studies point out the promising results in terms of energy payback time and the environmental impacts at the industrial‐scale, that are the lowest compared with commercial PVs, if 1 kWp is used as the functional unit. In addition, PSCs present less supply risk than other photovoltaic technologies. Only cesium, which is dispensable, can present a specific risk. Current production costs could be reduced if barrier foils and transparent conductive oxide coated plastics can be found. However, this cost could be competitive selling into niche markets. In addition, their lightness, flexibility and ease of integration give them very advantageous qualities for social acceptance.ca_CA
dc.format.extent17 p.ca_CA
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfca_CA
dc.language.isoengca_CA
dc.publisherWileyca_CA
dc.relation.isPartOfAdvanced Energy and Sustainability Research, 2021ca_CA
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/*
dc.subjectcarbon footprintca_CA
dc.subjectcumulative energy demandca_CA
dc.subjectenergy payback timeca_CA
dc.subjectlife cycle assessmentca_CA
dc.subjectperovskitesca_CA
dc.subjectsustainable life cycle assessmentca_CA
dc.titleComparison of Perovskite Solar Cells with other Photovoltaics Technologies from the Point of View of Life Cycle Assessmentca_CA
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca_CA
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/aesr.202000088
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/724424
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessca_CA
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aesr.202000088ca_CA
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca_CA
project.funder.nameEuropean Research Councilca_CA
project.funder.nameConselleria d'Educació, Investigació, Cultura i Esportca_CA
project.funder.nameMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidadesca_CA
oaire.awardNumber724424ca_CA
oaire.awardNumberPROMETEO/2018/098ca_CA
oaire.awardNumberSTABLE PID2019‐107314RB‐I00ca_CA


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como: Atribución 4.0 Internacional