Consensus statement on the problem of terminology in psychological interventions using the internet or digital components
Ver/ Abrir
Impacto
Scholar |
Otros documentos de la autoría: Smoktunowicz, Ewelina; Barak, Azy; Andersson, Gerhard; Banos, Rosa M.; Berger, Thomas; Botella, Cristina; Dear, Blake F.; Donker, T.; Ebert, David Daniel; Hadjistavropoulos, Heather; Hodgins, David; Kaldo, Viktor; Mohr, David; Nordgreen, Tine; Powers, Mark; Riper, Heleen; Ritterband, Lee; Rozental, Alexander; Schueller, Stephen; Titov, Nickolai; Weise, Cornelia; Carlbring, Per
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemcomunitat-uji-handle:10234/9
comunitat-uji-handle2:10234/8033
comunitat-uji-handle3:10234/8636
comunitat-uji-handle4:
INVESTIGACIONMetadatos
Título
Consensus statement on the problem of terminology in psychological interventions using the internet or digital componentsAutoría
Fecha de publicación
2020-06-02Editor
ElsevierISSN
2214-7829Cita bibliográfica
SMOKTUNOWICZ, Ewelina, et al. Consensus statement on the problem of terminology in psychological interventions using the internet or digital components. Internet Interventions, 2020, p. 100331.Tipo de documento
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleVersión de la editorial
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/internet-interventionsVersión
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPalabras clave / Materias
Resumen
Since the emergence of psychological interventions delivered via the Internet they have differed in numerous
ways. The wealth of formats, methods, and technological solutions has led to increased availability and ... [+]
Since the emergence of psychological interventions delivered via the Internet they have differed in numerous
ways. The wealth of formats, methods, and technological solutions has led to increased availability and costeffectiveness of clinical care, however, it has simultaneously generated a multitude of terms. With this paper, we
first aim to establish whether a terminology issue exists in the field of Internet-delivered psychological interventions. If so, we aim to determine its implications for research, education, and practice. Furthermore, we
intend to discuss solutions to mitigate the problem; in particular, we propose the concept of a common glossary.
We invited 23 experts in the field of Internet-delivered interventions to respond to four questions, and employed
the Delphi method to facilitate a discussion. We found that experts overwhelmingly agreed that there were
terminological challenges, and that it had significant consequences for conducting research, treating patients,
educating students, and informing the general public about Internet-delivered interventions. A cautious agreement has been reached that formulating a common glossary would be beneficial for the field to address the
terminology issue. We end with recommendations for the possible formats of the glossary and means to disseminate it in a way that maximizes the probability of broad acceptance for a variety of stakeholders. [-]
Publicado en
Internet Interventions 21 (2020) 100331Derechos de acceso
© 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Aparece en las colecciones
- PSB_Articles [1315]
El ítem tiene asociados los siguientes ficheros de licencia: