Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorBoqué, Concepción
dc.contributor.authorReyes Abad, María
dc.contributor.authorAgustín, María José
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Goñi, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorMoreno, Carolina
dc.contributor.authorGabás Rivera, Clara
dc.contributor.authorGranados, Enrique
dc.contributor.authorCastro-Gómez, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorPardo, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorLizán, Luis
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-19T08:08:15Z
dc.date.available2020-11-19T08:08:15Z
dc.date.issued2019-04-03
dc.identifier.citationBOQUÉ, Concepción, et al. Treatment decision-making in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: Key factors for healthcare professionals. PRELIC study. Journal of Geriatric Oncology, 2020, vol. 11, no 1, p. 24-30.ca_CA
dc.identifier.issn1879-4068
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10234/190415
dc.description.abstractObjective: To explore the preferences of Spanish healthcare professionals (haematologists and hospital pharmacists) for the treatment selection of active Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia (CLL) patients at first relapse, condition that mainly afflicts older adults. Methods: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted among haematologists and hospital pharmacists. A literature review and a focus group informed the DCE design. CLL treatment settings were defined by seven attributes: four patient/disease-related attributes (age, functional status, comorbidities, and risk of the disease) and three treatment-related attributes (efficacy [hazard ratio of progression-free survival, HR-PFS], rate of discontinuations due to adverse events and cost). A mixed-logit model was used to determine choice-based preferences. Relative importance (RI) of attributes was calculated and compared between stakeholders. Willingnessto-pay (WTP) was estimated through the DCE. Besides, nine ad-hoc questions were posed, to explore more in depth CLL treatment decision making. Results: A total of 130 participants (72 haematologists and 58 hospital pharmacists) answered the DCE. All attributes were significant predictors of preferences (p b 0.05) in the multinomial model. Higher RI was obtained for treatment-related attributes: the highest rated being ‘cost’ (23.8%) followed by ‘efficacy’ (20.9%). Regarding patient-related attributes, the highest RI was obtained for ‘age’ (18.1%). No significant differences (p N 0.05) in RI between haematologists and pharmacists were found. WTP for the treatment was higher for younger CLL patients. Ad-hoc questions showed that patient age and functional status influence treatment decisions. Conclusions: For healthcare professionals, ‘cost’ and ‘efficacy’ (treatment-related attributes) and age (patientrelated attribute) are the maca_CA
dc.format.extent7 p.ca_CA
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfca_CA
dc.language.isoengca_CA
dc.publisherElsevierca_CA
dc.publisherElsevier [Commercial Publisher] International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG)ca_CA
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Geriatric Oncology 11 (2020) 24–30ca_CA
dc.rights© 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.ca_CA
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectchronic lymphocytic leukaemiaca_CA
dc.subjectdiscrete choice experimentca_CA
dc.subjectpreferencesca_CA
dc.subjecthealthcare professionalsca_CA
dc.subjectphysiological ageca_CA
dc.subjectelderlyca_CA
dc.subjectageismca_CA
dc.subjectdecision-makingca_CA
dc.subjectdrug costca_CA
dc.titleTreatment decision-making in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: Key factors for healthcare professionals. PRELIC studyca_CA
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca_CA
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2019.03.010
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessca_CA
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://www.geriatriconcology.net/ca_CA
dc.contributor.funderGilead Sciencesca_CA
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca_CA


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

© 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como: © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.