Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorHaynes, Robert Brian
dc.contributor.authorWilczynski, Nancy
dc.contributor.authorMcKibbon, K. Ann
dc.contributor.authorWalker, Cynthia J.
dc.contributor.authorSinclair, John
dc.coverage.spatialCanadá
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-14T09:42:37Z
dc.date.available2020-06-14T09:42:37Z
dc.date.issued1994
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10234/188681
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To develop optimal MEDLINE search strategies for retrieving sound clinical studies of the etiology, prognosis, diagnosis, prevention, or treatment of disorders in adult general medicine. DESIGN: Analytic survey of operating characteristics of search strategies developed by computerized combinations of terms selected to detect studies meeting basic methodologic criteria for direct clinical use in adult general medicine. MEASURES: The sensitivities, specificities, precision, and accuracy of 134,264 unique combinations of search terms were determined by comparison with a manual review of all articles (the "gold standard") in ten internal medicine and general medicine journals for 1986 and 1991. RESULTS: Less than half of the studies of the topics of interest met basic criteria for scientific merit for testing clinical applications. Combinations of search terms reached peak sensitivities of 82% for sound studies of etiology, 92% for prognosis, 92% for diagnosis, and 99% for therapy in 1991. Compared with the best single terms, multiple terms increased sensitivity for sound studies by over 30% (absolute increase), but with some loss of specificity when sensitivity was maximized. For 1986, combinations reached peak sensitivities of 72% for etiology, 95% for prognosis, 86% for diagnosis, and 98% for therapy. When search terms were combined to maximize specificity, over 93% specificity was achieved for all purpose categories in both years. Compared with individual terms, combined terms achieved near-perfect specificity that was maintained with modest increases in sensitivity in all purpose categories except therapy. Increases in accuracy were achieved by combining terms for all purpose categories, with peak accuracies reaching over 90% for therapy in 1986 and 1991. CONCLUSIONS: The retrieval of studies of important clinical topics cited in MEDLINE can be substantially enhanced by selected combinations of indexing terms and textwords.ca_CA
dc.format.extent12ca_CA
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfca_CA
dc.language.isoengca_CA
dc.publisherOxford University Pressca_CA
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1994, vol. 1, nº 6, pp. 447-458ca_CA
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/*
dc.titleDeveloping Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Clinically Sound Studies in MEDLINEca_CA
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca_CA
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/jamia.1994.95153434
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessca_CA
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca_CA


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem