Peer tutoring in mathematics in primary education: a systematic review
Impacte
![Google Scholar](/xmlui/themes/Mirage2/images/uji/logo_google.png)
![Microsoft Academico](/xmlui/themes/Mirage2/images/uji/logo_microsoft.png)
Metadades
Mostra el registre complet de l'elementcomunitat-uji-handle:10234/9
comunitat-uji-handle2:10234/174801
comunitat-uji-handle3:10234/174813
comunitat-uji-handle4:
INVESTIGACIONAquest recurs és restringit
https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1474176 |
Metadades
Títol
Peer tutoring in mathematics in primary education: a systematic reviewData de publicació
2018-06-07Editor
Taylor & FrancisCita bibliogràfica
ALEGRE ANSUÁTEGUI, Francisco José; MOLINER MIRAVET, Lidón; MAROTO, Ana; LORENZO VALENTÍN, Gil (2018). Peer tutoring in mathematics in primary education: a systematic review. Educational Review, online 7/6/2018Tipus de document
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleVersió de l'editorial
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00131911.2018.1474176?journalCode=cedr20Versió
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionParaules clau / Matèries
Resum
In this review, we have examined the main components of peer tutoring in mathematics in primary education (1st to 6th grade) settings. Fifty studies were included in this article. The review was intended to examine ... [+]
In this review, we have examined the main components of peer tutoring in mathematics in primary education (1st to 6th grade) settings. Fifty studies were included in this article. The review was intended to examine trends in this research field regarding roles of the participants, their age (same-age vs cross-age), the methodological approach taken (quantitative, qualitative or mixed), the type of quantitative design, the analysed variables and organisational matters (number of participants, program duration, sessions per week and duration of the sessions). Main results were also included for each article and effect sizes were calculated when possible. It was found that 75% of the studies revealed medium to very large effect sizes. The average effect size was reported to be large to very large (Cohen’s d = .89; standard deviation = .60). Limitations, recommendations for future research, implications for practice and conclusions are also presented. [-]
Publicat a
Educational Review, online 7/6/2018Drets d'accés
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
Apareix a les col.leccions
- EDE_Articles [420]
- PDCSLL_Articles [320]