Who is collaborating with whom? Part I. Mathematical model and methods for empirical testing
Impact
Scholar |
Other documents of the author: Kretschmer, Hildrun; Beaver, Donald deB.; Ozel, Bulent; Kretschmer, Theo
Metadata
Show full item recordcomunitat-uji-handle:10234/9
comunitat-uji-handle2:10234/8643
comunitat-uji-handle3:10234/8644
comunitat-uji-handle4:
INVESTIGACIONThis resource is restricted
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.01.004 |
Metadata
Title
Who is collaborating with whom? Part I. Mathematical model and methods for empirical testingDate
2015-04Publisher
ElsevierBibliographic citation
KRETSCHMER, Hildrun, et al. Who is collaborating with whom? Part I. Mathematical model and methods for empirical testing. Journal of Informetrics, 2015, vol. 9, no 2, p. 359-372.Type
info:eu-repo/semantics/articlePublisher version
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175115771500005XSubject
Abstract
There are two versions in the literature of counting co-author pairs. Whereas the first version leads to a two-dimensional (2-D) power function distribution; the other version shows three-dimensional (3-D) graphs, ... [+]
There are two versions in the literature of counting co-author pairs. Whereas the first version leads to a two-dimensional (2-D) power function distribution; the other version shows three-dimensional (3-D) graphs, totally rotatable around and their shapes are visible in space from all possible points of view. As a result, these new 3-D computer graphs, called “Social Gestalts” deliver more comprehensive information about social network structures than simple 2-D power function distributions. The mathematical model of Social Gestalts and the corresponding methods for the 3-D visualization and animation of collaboration networks are presented in Part I of this paper. Fundamental findings in psychology/sociology and physics are used as a basis for the development of this model.
The application of these new methods to male and to female networks is shown in Part II. After regression analysis the visualized Social Gestalts are rather identical with the corresponding empirical distributions (R2 > 0.99). The structures of female co-authorship networks differ markedly from the structures of the male co-authorship networks. For female co-author pairs’ networks, accentuation of productivity dissimilarities of the pairs is becoming visible but on the contrary, for male co-author pairs’ networks, accentuation of productivity similarities of the pairs is expressed. [-]
Is part of
Journal of Informetrics Volume 9, Issue 2, April 2015Rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
This item appears in the folowing collection(s)
- ECO_Articles [696]
The following license files are associated with this item: