Procedural fairness in lotteries assigning initial roles in a dynamic setting
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemcomunitat-uji-handle:10234/9
comunitat-uji-handle2:10234/8643
comunitat-uji-handle3:10234/8644
comunitat-uji-handle4:
INVESTIGACIONEste recurso está restringido
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10683-015-9469-5 |
Metadatos
Título
Procedural fairness in lotteries assigning initial roles in a dynamic settingFecha de publicación
2015Editor
SpringerISSN
1386-4157; 1573-6938Cita bibliográfica
GRIMALDA, Gianluca; KAR, Anirban; PROTO, Eugenio. Procedural fairness in lotteries assigning initial roles in a dynamic setting. Experimental Economics, 2015, p. 1-23.Tipo de documento
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleVersión de la editorial
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10683-015-9469-5Palabras clave / Materias
Resumen
We extend the study of procedural fairness in three new directions. Firstly, we focus on lotteries determining the initial roles in a two-person game. One of the roles carries a potential advantage over the other. All ... [+]
We extend the study of procedural fairness in three new directions. Firstly, we focus on lotteries determining the initial roles in a two-person game. One of the roles carries a potential advantage over the other. All the experimental literature has thus far focused on lotteries determining the final payoffs of a game. Secondly, we modify procedural fairness in a dynamic—i.e. over several repetitions of a game—as well as in a static—i.e. within a single game-sense. Thirdly, we analyse whether assigning individuals a minimal chance of achieving an advantaged position is enough to make them willing to accept substantially more inequality. We find that procedural fairness matters under all of these accounts. Individuals clearly respond to the degree of fairness in assigning initial roles, appraise contexts that are dynamically fair more positively than contexts that are not, and are generally more willing to accept unequal outcomes when they are granted a minimal opportunity to acquire the advantaged position. Unexpectedly, granting full equality of opportunity does not lead to the highest efficiency. [-]
Publicado en
Experimental Economics, 2015, p. 1-23.Derechos de acceso
© Springer International Publishing AG, Part of Springer Science+Business Media.
The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/0.1007/s10683-015-9469-5
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
Aparece en las colecciones
- ECO_Articles [696]