Approach for developing coordinated rubrics to convey quality criteria in MCAD training
![Thumbnail](/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10234/147406/Company_2015Approachdeveloping.pdf.jpg?sequence=4&isAllowed=y)
Ver/ Abrir
Impacto
![Google Scholar](/xmlui/themes/Mirage2/images/uji/logo_google.png)
![Microsoft Academico](/xmlui/themes/Mirage2/images/uji/logo_microsoft.png)
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemcomunitat-uji-handle:10234/9
comunitat-uji-handle2:10234/43662
comunitat-uji-handle3:10234/43643
comunitat-uji-handle4:
INVESTIGACIONMetadatos
Título
Approach for developing coordinated rubrics to convey quality criteria in MCAD trainingFecha de publicación
2015-06Editor
ElsevierCita bibliográfica
COMPANY, Pedro; CONTERO; Manuel; OTEY, Jeffrey; PLUMED FERRER, Raquel. Approach for developing coordinated rubrics to convey quality criteria in MCAD training. Computer-Aided Design, Volume 63, June 2015, Pages 101–117Tipo de documento
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleVersión de la editorial
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010448514002309Versión
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionPalabras clave / Materias
Resumen
This paper describes an approach to convey quality-oriented strategies to CAD trainees by embedding quality criteria into rubrics so as to force CAD trainees to understand them early in their instruction. To this end, ... [+]
This paper describes an approach to convey quality-oriented strategies to CAD trainees by embedding quality criteria into rubrics so as to force CAD trainees to understand them early in their instruction. To this end, the paper analyzes how CAD quality criteria can be organized around quality dimensions and embedded into rubrics in order to enforce quality modeling during the CAD training of novice product designers. Hence, the ambit of this study is training with history-based parametric feature␣based MCAD systems, although the general conclusions are believed to be adaptable to other CAD training scenarios. Furthermore, it introduces an approach based on progressive refinement, which results in an assertions map that indicates quality dimensions vs. sequence of tasks for CAD models. The map illustrates how the expand-contract strategy adapts the rubrics to CAD trainee progress and assists them in comprehending the different dimensions of the rubrics. The paper also highlights lessons learned on the suitability of using separate rubrics for different tasks, the need of accurately timing the expand-contract process, and on the convenience of supporting rubrics with suitable teaching, which must convey good practices and evaluation tools through rubrics. The experiments describe the different lessons learned and illustrate the suggested process for replicating our approach for further developing rubrics adapted to other scenarios. [-]
Publicado en
Compuer-Aided Design, Volume 63, June 2015Derechos de acceso
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Aparece en las colecciones
- INIT_Articles [751]