A descriptive study of inaccuracy in articles titles on bibliometrics published in biomedical journals
Impacto
![Google Scholar](/xmlui/themes/Mirage2/images/uji/logo_google.png)
![Microsoft Academico](/xmlui/themes/Mirage2/images/uji/logo_microsoft.png)
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemcomunitat-uji-handle:10234/9
comunitat-uji-handle2:10234/8035
comunitat-uji-handle3:10234/8640
comunitat-uji-handle4:
INVESTIGACIONEste recurso está restringido
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1296-5 |
Metadatos
Título
A descriptive study of inaccuracy in articles titles on bibliometrics published in biomedical journalsFecha de publicación
2014-10Editor
Springer VerlagCita bibliográfica
ALEIXANDRE-BENAVENT, Rafael; MONTALT-RESURECCIÓ, Vicent; VALDERRAMA-ZURIÁN, Juan Carlos. A descriptive study of inaccuracy in article titles on bibliometrics published in biomedical journals. Scientometrics, 2014, 101.1: 781-791..Tipo de documento
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleVersión de la editorial
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-014-1296-5Palabras clave / Materias
Resumen
In a bid for an eye-catching title, many writers use devices such as interrogation and exclamation marks, metaphors, double meanings and vague expressions which do not comply with accepted standards in style manuals ... [+]
In a bid for an eye-catching title, many writers use devices such as interrogation and exclamation marks, metaphors, double meanings and vague expressions which do not comply with accepted standards in style manuals of scientific writing. The purpose of this article is to analyse the lack of accuracy of titles in articles on bibliometrics published in biomedical journals and to discuss the effect this may have on the reader. A corpus of 1,505 titles included in PubMed and Web of Science between 2009 and 2011 and retrieved under the MeSH major topic “bibliometrics” and other related terms was analyzed. Different types of inaccuracy were identified and a classification was developed and used for this particular study. 23.4 % of the titles contain inaccuracies of some kind. Editorial titles show a higher percentage of these (11.43 %) than original articles (8.83 %) and letters (3.2 %), the most frequent being the inclusion of a question in the title (seen in 30.9 % of the papers), followed by vague and imprecise expressions (17.8 %), acronyms (16.4 %) and double meanings (14 %). Many titles fail to comply with the conventions of scientific writing. A descriptive title accurately reflecting the content of an article would give readers a better idea of its content, help them to decide more rapidly whether they want to read it and facilitate retrieval from bibliographic databases. [-]
Publicado en
Scientometrics October 2014, Volume 101, Issue 1Derechos de acceso
© Springer International Publishing AG, Part of Springer Science+Business Media
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
Aparece en las colecciones
- TRAD_Articles [353]