Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
The Role of Payoff Valence on Voting: Egalitarian for Gains and Selfish for Losses
dc.contributor.author | Alos-Ferrer, Carlos | |
dc.contributor.author | Garagnani, Michele | |
dc.contributor.author | García-Segarra, Jaume | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-07T12:33:45Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-01-07T12:33:45Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Alós-Ferrer C, Garagnani M and García-Segarra J (2021) The Role of Payoff Valence on Voting: Egalitarian for Gains and Selfish for Losses. Front. Psychol. 12:737225. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.737225 | ca_CA |
dc.identifier.issn | 1664-1078 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10234/196383 | |
dc.description.abstract | We study how payoff valence affects voting behavior on the distribution of monetary outcomes framed as gains or losses in a group when using standard plurality voting (PV) procedures and when using approval voting (AV). The latter method allows the subjects to approve of as many alternatives as they wish and has been shown to eliminate the incentives to vote strategically. For both methods, we observe that voters express higher support for egalitarian allocations (and lower support for selfish options) when sharing gains than when sharing losses. Moreover, the average number of approved alternatives per ballot is higher when distributions are framed in terms of gains than when they are framed in terms of losses. We also discuss under which circumstances the shift in voting behavior is more likely to produce changes in the electoral outcome. The results suggest that framing manipulations (payoff valence) can significantly impact voting behavior. | ca_CA |
dc.format.extent | 10 p. | ca_CA |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | ca_CA |
dc.language.iso | eng | ca_CA |
dc.publisher | Frontiers Media | |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Frontiers in Psychology 12:737225 | ca_CA |
dc.rights | © 2021 Alós-Ferrer, Garagnani and García-Segarra. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. | ca_CA |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ | ca_CA |
dc.subject | gains | ca_CA |
dc.subject | losses | ca_CA |
dc.subject | framing | ca_CA |
dc.subject | payoff valence | ca_CA |
dc.subject | plurality voting | ca_CA |
dc.subject | approval voting | ca_CA |
dc.title | The Role of Payoff Valence on Voting: Egalitarian for Gains and Selfish for Losses | ca_CA |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | ca_CA |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.737225 | |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | ca_CA |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | ca_CA |
project.funder.name | German Science Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG) | ca_CA |
oaire.awardNumber | Grant AL1169-2 | ca_CA |
Ficheros en el ítem
Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)
-
ECO_Articles [694]
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como: © 2021 Alós-Ferrer, Garagnani and García-Segarra. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.