Relative Impacts of Methylammonium Lead Triiodide Perovskite Solar Cells Based on Life Cycle Assessment
Ver/ Abrir
Impacto
Scholar |
Otros documentos de la autoría: Alberola-Borràs, Jaume-Adrià; Vidal, Rosario; Juarez-Perez, Emilio J.; Mas, Elena; Guerrero, Antonio; Mora-Sero, Ivan
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemcomunitat-uji-handle:10234/9
comunitat-uji-handle2:10234/7035
comunitat-uji-handle3:10234/8617
comunitat-uji-handle4:
INVESTIGACIONMetadatos
Título
Relative Impacts of Methylammonium Lead Triiodide Perovskite Solar Cells Based on Life Cycle AssessmentAutoría
Fecha de publicación
2017-11-22Editor
ElsevierISSN
0927-0248Cita bibliográfica
Alberola-Borràs, J. A., Vidal, R., Juárez-Pérez, E. J., Mas-Marzá, E., Guerrero, A., & Mora-Seró, I. (2017). Relative impacts of methylammonium lead triiodide perovskite solar cells based on life cycle assessment. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells.Tipo de documento
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleVersión de la editorial
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927024817306177?via%3DihubVersión
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionPalabras clave / Materias
Resumen
The environmental performance of four different device assembly procedures based on
hybrid halide perovskite solar cell (PSC) were assessed from cradle to grave using life
cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. In ... [+]
The environmental performance of four different device assembly procedures based on
hybrid halide perovskite solar cell (PSC) were assessed from cradle to grave using life
cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. In addition, a new environmental indicator was
defined to measure the time evolution of an impact category, specifically in this case,
human toxicity cancer payback time. PSCs procedures accounted for the probably three
more used basic recipes for laboratory perovskite deposition: 1) spin coating of
stoichiometric precursor solution, 2) spin coating of precursor solution using lead
chloride precursor and 3) the two step deposition method. Also, the two most widely
used substrate configurations (planar and mesoporous substrate) were considered. LCA
included three realistic scenarios for the end of life: 1) residual landfill, 2) reuse and
residual landfill and 3) reuse and recycling. The remaining variable parameters to
assemble the device were fixed in common for all four devices, which were the major
responsible of the whole PSC impact. Lead of PSCs had no significant contribution in
environmental impacts. Beyond shared procedure steps, impacts generated by the twostep
method and the use of mesostructured type substrate were higher. End of life
scenario with reuse and recycling improved the toxicity impact categories. [-]
Publicado en
Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2017.Proyecto de investigación
The research leading to these results has received funding from MINECO of Spain under project MAT2013-47192-C3-1-R and Generalitat Valenciana under project ACOMP/2015/105.Derechos de acceso
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Aparece en las colecciones
- INAM_Articles [531]
- FCA_Articles [511]
- EMC_Articles [832]
El ítem tiene asociados los siguientes ficheros de licencia: