Evaluation of uncertainty sources in the determination of testosterone in urine by calibration-based and isotope dilution quantification using ultra high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry
Impact
Scholar |
Other documents of the author: Pitarch-Motellón, Jorge; Roig-Navarro, Antoni F.; Sancho, Juan V; Ibáñez, Maria; Fabregat-Cabello, Neus; Pozo, Óscar J.; Ventura, Rosa; García Alonso, J. Ignacio; Rodríguez González, Pablo; González Gago, Adriana; Ereño Artabe, Amaia; Van Eenoo, Peter; Deventer, Koen; Dehnes, Yvette; Rzeppa, Sebastian
Metadata
Show full item recordcomunitat-uji-handle:10234/9
comunitat-uji-handle2:10234/33596
comunitat-uji-handle3:10234/33597
comunitat-uji-handle4:
INVESTIGACIONMetadata
Title
Evaluation of uncertainty sources in the determination of testosterone in urine by calibration-based and isotope dilution quantification using ultra high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometryAuthor (s)
Date
2017-06Publisher
ElsevierType
info:eu-repo/semantics/articlePublisher version
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021967317308300Version
info:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersionSubject
Abstract
Three quantification methodologies, namely calibration with internal standard (Cal-IS, non-weighted), weighted calibration with internal standard (wCal-IS) and isotope pattern deconvolution (IPD) have been used for ... [+]
Three quantification methodologies, namely calibration with internal standard (Cal-IS, non-weighted), weighted calibration with internal standard (wCal-IS) and isotope pattern deconvolution (IPD) have been used for the determination of testosterone in urine by LC-MS/MS. Uncertainty has been calculated and compared for the three methodologies through intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility assays. IPD showed the best performance for the intra-laboratory reproducibility, with RSD and combined uncertainty values below 4% and 9% respectively. wCal-IS showed similar performance, while Cal-IS where not constant and clearly worse at the lowest concentration assayed (2 ng/mL) reaching RSD values up to 16%. The inter-laboratory assay indicated similar results although wCal-IS RSD (20%) was higher than IPD (10%) and Cal-IS get worse with RSD higher than 40% for the lowest concentration level. Uncertainty budgets calculated for the three procedures revealed that intercept and slope were the most important factors contributing to uncertainty for Cal-IS. The main factors for wCal-IS and IPD were the volumes of sample and/or standard measured. [-]
Is part of
Journal of Chromatography A, June 2017Rights
© 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
This item appears in the folowing collection(s)
- IUPA_Articles [310]