Validation of the Spanish version of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire
Impacto
Scholar |
Otros documentos de la autoría: De las Cuevas, Carlos; Perestelo-Perez, Lilisbeth; Rivero-Santana, Amado; Cebolla Marti, Ausias; Scholl, Isabelle; Härter, Martin
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemcomunitat-uji-handle:10234/9
comunitat-uji-handle2:10234/8033
comunitat-uji-handle3:10234/8636
comunitat-uji-handle4:
INVESTIGACIONEste recurso está restringido
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12183 |
Metadatos
Título
Validation of the Spanish version of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making QuestionnaireAutoría
Fecha de publicación
2014Editor
WileyISSN
1369-6513Tipo de documento
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleVersión de la editorial
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.12183/abstractVersión
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPalabras clave / Materias
Resumen
Objective
To translate and assess the psychometric properties of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) for measuring patients' perceptions of how clinicians' performance fits the SDM process ... [+]
Objective
To translate and assess the psychometric properties of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) for measuring patients' perceptions of how clinicians' performance fits the SDM process.
Design
Cross-sectional study.
Setting and Participants
Data were collected in primary care health centres. Patients suffering from chronic diseases and facing a medical decision were included in the study.
Measurements
The original German SDM-Q-9 was translated to Spanish using the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-reported measures as the methodological model for Spanish translation. Reliability (internal consistency) and construct validity [exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)] were assessed.
Results
The final Spanish version of the SDM-Q-9 was tested in a primary care sample of 540 patients. The SDM-Q-9 presented adequate reliability and acceptable validity. Internal consistency yielded a Cronbach's alpha of 0.885 for the whole scale. EFA showed a two-factorial solution, and for the CFA, the best solution was obtained with a one-dimensional factor with the item 1 excluded, which produced the best indexes of fit.
Discussion and Conclusions
The Spanish version of the SDM-Q-9 showed adequate reliability and acceptable validity parameters among primary care patients. The SDM-Q-9 is suitable for use in Spain and other Spanish-speaking countries with similarly organized health-care systems. The use of the SDM-Q-9 may contribute to the evaluation of SDM process from the patient's perspective. [-]
Publicado en
Health Expectations, 2014 (Published On Line)Derechos de acceso
"This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: [LAS CUEVAS, Carlos, et al. Validation of the Spanish version of the 9‐item Shared Decision‐Making Questionnaire. Health Expectations, 2014], which has been published in final form at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12183. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving."
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
Aparece en las colecciones
- PSB_Articles [1330]