Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorAndani, A.
dc.contributor.authorLafuente-Luengo, Juan Angel
dc.contributor.authorNovales, A.
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-23T11:14:02Z
dc.date.available2014-06-23T11:14:02Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.issn0270-7314
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10234/95622
dc.description.abstractWe analyze the hedging effectiveness of positions that replicate stock indexes using corresponding futures contracts through the application of a dynamic, stochastic hedging strategy proposed by Lafuente, J. A. and Novales, A. (2003). Conclusive gains do not emerge in any of the markets analyzed over the period considered, relative to the use of a constant unit hedge ratio. These findings are consistent with the trend observed in the IBEX 35 futures market study of Lafuente, J. A. and Novales, A. (2003). Our empirical evidence suggests that, contrary to what happens in less liquid markets, the discrepancy between theoretical and quoted prices in index futures contracts in fully developed markets does not represent a noise factor that can be successfully exploited for hedging.ca_CA
dc.format.extent23 p.ca_CA
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfca_CA
dc.language.isoengca_CA
dc.publisherWileyca_CA
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Futures Markets, 29, 11, p. 1050–1066ca_CA
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/*
dc.subjectfuture mispricingca_CA
dc.subjecthedging effectivenessca_CA
dc.titleLiquidity and hedging effectiveness under futures mispricing: International evidenceca_CA
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca_CA
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fut.20395
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessca_CA
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fut.20395/abstractca_CA
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersion


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem