What format of treatment do patients with emotional disorders prefer and why? Implications for public mental health settings and policies
Ver/ Abrir
Impacto
Scholar |
Otros documentos de la autoría: Osma López, Jorge Javier; Suso-Ribera, Carlos; Peris Baquero, Óscar; Gil Lacruz, Marta; Pérez Ayerra, Luisa; Ferreres-Galan, Vanesa; Torres-Alfosea, Mª Ángeles; López-Escriche, María; Domínguez, Olga
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemcomunitat-uji-handle:10234/9
comunitat-uji-handle2:10234/8033
comunitat-uji-handle3:10234/8636
comunitat-uji-handle4:
INVESTIGACIONMetadatos
Título
What format of treatment do patients with emotional disorders prefer and why? Implications for public mental health settings and policiesAutoría
Fecha de publicación
2019Editor
Public Library of ScienceISSN
1932-6203Cita bibliográfica
Osma J, Suso-Ribera C, Peris-Baquero O´, Gil-Lacruz M, Pe´rez-Ayerra L, Ferreres-Galan V, et al. (2019) What format of treatment do patients with emotional disorders prefer and why? Implications for public mental health settings and policies. PLoS ONE 14(6): e0218117. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218117Tipo de documento
info:eu-repo/semantics/articleVersión de la editorial
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0218117Versión
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionResumen
Objective
We analyzed the preference of three psychological intervention formats—individual, group,
and online—in a sample of 267 patients with a primary diagnosis of emotional disorder in
Spanish public mental ... [+]
Objective
We analyzed the preference of three psychological intervention formats—individual, group,
and online—in a sample of 267 patients with a primary diagnosis of emotional disorder in
Spanish public mental health settings.
Method
We studied patients’ preferences considering sociodemographic characteristics, diagnoses,
history of psychological treatments, number of sessions, and satisfaction with past
interventions.
Results
Most participants (85.4%) preferred psychological treatment in an individual format, 14.2%
in group, and 0.4% online. When comparing the people who chose individual and group
treatment, no demographic or clinical differences were found. The arguments against group
format were the lack of privacy and expression difficulties. Regarding online format, these
included being considered impersonal and ineffective.
Conclusion
The rejection of group and online psychotherapy formats allows us to define the actions we
should carry out in public mental health settings to improve the acceptance of more costeffective therapy formats. [-]
Publicado en
PLoS ONE 14(6): e0218117Derechos de acceso
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Aparece en las colecciones
- PSB_Articles [1293]
El ítem tiene asociados los siguientes ficheros de licencia:
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como: : © 2019 Osma et al. This is an open
access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License, which
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original
author and source are credited.