Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorNogués Solán, Xavier
dc.contributor.authorNolla, J. M.
dc.contributor.authorCasado, E.
dc.contributor.authorJódar, E.
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz-Torres, M.
dc.contributor.authorQuesada-Gómez, J. M.
dc.contributor.authorCanals, L.
dc.contributor.authorBalcells, M.
dc.contributor.authorLizán, Luis
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-25T09:57:05Z
dc.date.available2018-05-25T09:57:05Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationNogués, X., Nolla, J.M., Casado, E. et al. Osteoporos Int (2018) 29: 489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-4310-yca_CA
dc.identifier.issn0937-941X
dc.identifier.issn1433-2965
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10234/174829
dc.description.abstractSummary To reach a Spanish expert consensus on a treat-to-target strategy in osteoporosis, a Delphi Consensus Study has been developed. Most of the experts (59.8%) were rheumatologist with a mean clinical experience of 21.3 years (SD 8.5). Consensus was achieved for 70% of the items. Therapeutic objectives, patient follow-up scheme, treatment failure criteria, and appropriate treatment choice for use in T2T strategy in Spain have been defined. Introduction The paper aims to achieve a Spanish expert consensus on a treat-to-target (T2T) strategy in osteoporosis. Methods A scientific committee led the project and was involved in expert panel identification and Delphi questionnaire development. Two Delphi rounds were completed. The first-round questionnaire included 24 items and assessed, using a seven-point Likert scale, the experts’ wish (W) and prognosis (P) in 5 years for each topic (applicability, therapeutic objectives, patient follow-up, and possible treatment to be prescribed). Items for which there was no consensus in the first round were included in the second round. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement (somewhat/mostly/entirely agree) or disagreement (somewhat/mostly/entirely disagree) responses. Results Of the experts, 112 and 106 completed the first and second rounds, respectively. 59.8% were rheumatologists with a mean clinical experience of 21.3 years (SD 8.5). Consensus was achieved for 70% of the items, and was established regarding the utility of a T2T strategy to define therapeutic objectives, optimal follow-up, and therapeutic algorithm. Participants agreed on the utility of the bone mineral density (BMD) value (T-score >−2.5 SD for spine and >−2.5/−2.0 SD for femoral neck), lack of fractures, and fracture risk (FRAX) as therapeutic objectives. For measuring BMD changes, consensus was achieved on the suitability of hip and femoral neck locations. Experts agreed to consider treatment failure as when a significant BMD gain could not be achieved, or when a new fracture occurs within 2–3 years. There was consensus that all proposed therapies should achieve a therapeutic target through T2T strategy (treatments with the highest consensus scores were denosumab and teriparatide). Conclusion The therapeutic objectives, patient follow-up scheme, treatment failure criteria, and appropriate treatment choice for use in T2T strategy in Spain have been established by a panel of experts. Some aspects nevertheless still require further analysis.ca_CA
dc.format.extent11 p.ca_CA
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfca_CA
dc.language.isoengca_CA
dc.publisherSpringer Verlagca_CA
dc.relation.isPartOfOsteoporos Int (2018) 29ca_CA
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2017 This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.ca_CA
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subjectManagementca_CA
dc.subjectOsteoporosisca_CA
dc.subjectOsteoporosis careca_CA
dc.subjectTreatmentca_CA
dc.subjectTreatment failureca_CA
dc.subjectTreat to targetca_CA
dc.subjectTreat-to-target strategyca_CA
dc.titleSpanish consensus on treat to target for osteoporosisca_CA
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca_CA
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-4310-y
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessca_CA
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00198-017-4310-yca_CA
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca_CA


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

© The Author(s) 2017

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como: © The Author(s) 2017 This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.