Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
Measuring Corporate Environmental Performance: A Methodology for Sustainable Development
dc.contributor.author | Escrig-Olmedo, Elena | |
dc.contributor.author | Muñoz-Torres, María Jesus | |
dc.contributor.author | Fernandez-Izquierdo, Maria Angeles | |
dc.contributor.author | Rivera-Lirio, Juana M. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-04-28T11:39:47Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-04-28T11:39:47Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-08-22 | |
dc.identifier.citation | ESCRIG‐OLMEDO, Elena, et al. Measuring Corporate Environmental Performance: A Methodology for Sustainable Development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2015 | ca_CA |
dc.identifier.issn | 0964-4733 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10234/159017 | |
dc.description.abstract | Assessing corporate environmental performance (CEP) that is both comprehensive and consistent with sustainable development both for society and companies, while at the same time taking heed of the facts and interests of each stakeholder, is not a simple feat. Due to the multidimensional character of the sustainability concept, several questions must be considered in the evaluation process: (i) the qualitative nature of indicators and the complexity of developing a synthetic index; (ii) the difficulty of choosing properly statistical techniques for aggregation and (iii) the difficulty of introducing stakeholders’ preferences in the assessment models. This paper is an attempt to address this challenge by developing a framework for the assessment of CEP, based on the application of a fuzzy multi-criterion decision-making (MCDM) method. To achieve positive scores in a CEP assessment, an organization should be strategically committed and engage in environmental management and governance structures that are translated into good results in terms of both engagement and operational performance. Unless such premises are explicitly incorporated into the assessment criteria, the results would reveal that the CEP measurement could not be brought into a line with an earnest ambition of achieving true sustainable development. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment | ca_CA |
dc.description.sponsorShip | The authors wish acknowledge the support received from P1•1B2013-31 and P1•1B2013-48 projects through the Universitat Jaume I and Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility Master Degree (UJI-UNED). Moreover, we would like to thank two anonymous referees, participants at the PRI Academic Network Conference in Paris (November, 2013) and Patricia Crifo for their helpful comments. 1 850+ data points (base level); 250 + indicator scores and values (non-normalized) and ESG overall score, 4 pillar scores, 18 category scores. | ca_CA |
dc.format.extent | 21 p. | ca_CA |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | ca_CA |
dc.language.iso | eng | ca_CA |
dc.publisher | Wiley | ca_CA |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Business Strategy and the Environment, 2015 | ca_CA |
dc.rights | Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment | ca_CA |
dc.rights.uri | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ | * |
dc.subject | sustainable development; | ca_CA |
dc.subject | corporate environmental performance (CEP) | ca_CA |
dc.subject | multi-criterion decision-making (MCDM) methods | ca_CA |
dc.subject | commensurability | ca_CA |
dc.subject | fungibility | ca_CA |
dc.subject | stakeholders | ca_CA |
dc.title | Measuring Corporate Environmental Performance: A Methodology for Sustainable Development | ca_CA |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | ca_CA |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.1904 | |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | ca_CA |
dc.relation.publisherVersion | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bse.1904/full | ca_CA |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
Ficheros en el ítem
Ficheros | Tamaño | Formato | Ver |
---|---|---|---|
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem. |
Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)
-
COFIN_Articles [213]