Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChulvi Ramos, Vicente
dc.contributor.authorSonseca, Águeda
dc.contributor.authorMulet, Elena
dc.contributor.authorChakrabarti, Amaresh
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-30T12:09:29Z
dc.date.available2015-04-30T12:09:29Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.issn1050-0472
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10234/119431
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents an experimental study that was conducted to compare the results obtained from using different design methods (brainstorming (BR), functional analysis (FA), and SCAMPER) in design processes. The objectives of this work are twofold. The first was to determine whether there are any differences in the length of time devoted to the different types of activities that are carried out in the design process, depending on the method that is employed; in other words, whether the design methods that are used make a difference in the profile of time spent across the design activities. The second objective was to analyze whether there is any kind of relationship between the time spent on design process activities and the degree of creativity in the solutions that are obtained. Creativity evaluation has been done by means of the degree of novelty and the level of resolution of the designed solutions using creative product semantic scale (CPSS) questionnaire. The results show that there are significant differences between the amounts of time devoted to activities related to understanding the problem and the typology of the design method, intuitive or logical, that are used. While the amount of time spent on analyzing the problem is very small in intuitive methods, such as brainstorming and SCAMPER (around 8–9% of the time), with logical methods like functional analysis practically half the time is devoted to analyzing the problem. Also, it has been found that the amount of time spent in each design phase has an influence on the results in terms of creativity, but results are not enough strong to define in which measure are they affected. This paper offers new data and results on the distinct benefits to be obtained from applying design methods.ca_CA
dc.format.extent11 p.ca_CA
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfca_CA
dc.language.isoengca_CA
dc.publisherASME The American Society of Mechanical Engineersca_CA
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Mechanical Design, v. 134 (11)ca_CA
dc.rightsCopyright © 2012 by ASMEca_CA
dc.titleAssessment of the Relationships Among Design Methods, Design Activities, and Creativityca_CA
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca_CA
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4007362
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessca_CA
dc.relation.publisherVersionhttps://mechanicaldesign.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/article.aspx?articleid=1484885ca_CA


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record